Literature DB >> 20802015

A marker of homologous recombination predicts pathologic complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in primary breast cancer.

Monika Graeser1, Afshan McCarthy, Christopher J Lord, Kay Savage, Margaret Hills, Janine Salter, Nicholas Orr, Marina Parton, Ian E Smith, Jorge S Reis-Filho, Mitch Dowsett, Alan Ashworth, Nicholas C Turner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of defective homologous recombination (HR)-based DNA repair in sporadic primary breast cancers, examine the clincopathologic features that correlate with defective HR and the relationship with neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We examined a cohort of 68 patients with sporadic primary breast cancer who received neoadjuvant anthracylcine-based chemotherapy, with core biopsies taken 24 hours after the first cycle of chemotherapy. We assessed RAD51 focus formation, a marker of HR competence, by immunofluorescence in postchemotherapy biopsies along with geminin as a marker of proliferative cells. We assessed the RAD51 score as the proportion of proliferative cells with RAD51 foci.
RESULTS: A low RAD51 score was present in 26% of cases (15/57, 95% CI: 15%-40%). Low RAD51 score correlated with high histologic grade (P = 0.031) and high baseline Ki67 (P = 0.005). Low RAD51 score was more frequent in triple-negative breast cancers than in ER- and/or HER2-positive breast cancer (67% vs. 19% respectively; P = 0.0036). Low RAD51 score was strongly predictive of pathologic complete response (pathCR) to chemotherapy, with 33% low RAD51 score cancers achieving pathCR compared with 3% of other cancers (P = 0.011).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that defective HR, as indicated by low RAD51 score, may be one of the factors that underlie sensitivity to anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Defective HR is frequent in triple-negative breast cancer, but it is also present in a subset of other subtypes, identifying breast cancers that may benefit from therapies that target defective HR such as PARP inhibitors. ©2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20802015      PMCID: PMC3432445          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  35 in total

1.  Essential role for nuclear PTEN in maintaining chromosomal integrity.

Authors:  Wen Hong Shen; Adayabalam S Balajee; Jianli Wang; Hong Wu; Charis Eng; Pier Paolo Pandolfi; Yuxin Yin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18.

Authors:  B Fisher; A Brown; E Mamounas; S Wieand; A Robidoux; R G Margolese; A B Cruz; E R Fisher; D L Wickerham; N Wolmark; A DeCillis; J L Hoehn; A W Lees; N V Dimitrov
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Chemotherapy-induced apoptosis and Bcl-2 levels correlate with breast cancer response to chemotherapy.

Authors:  Thomas A Buchholz; Darren W Davis; David J McConkey; W Fraser Symmans; Vicente Valero; Anuja Jhingran; Susan L Tucker; Lajos Pusztai; Massimo Cristofanilli; Francisco J Esteva; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Aysegul A Sahin
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

4.  Pathologic complete response rates in young women with BRCA1-positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Tomasz Byrski; Jacek Gronwald; Tomasz Huzarski; Ewa Grzybowska; Magdalena Budryk; Malgorzata Stawicka; Tomasz Mierzwa; Marek Szwiec; Rafal Wisniowski; Monika Siolek; Rebecca Dent; Jan Lubinski; Steven Narod
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  A novel continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen compared with conventional chemotherapy in the neo-adjuvant treatment of early breast cancer: 5 year results of the TOPIC trial.

Authors:  I E Smith; R P A'Hern; G A Coombes; A Howell; S R Ebbs; T F Hickish; M E R O'Brien; J L Mansi; C B Wilson; A C Robinson; P A Murray; C G A Price; T J Perren; R W Laing; J M Bliss
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Coordinate expression of apoptosis-associated proteins in human breast cancer before and during chemotherapy.

Authors:  Marina Parton; Stanislaw Krajewski; Ian Smith; Maryla Krajewska; Caroline Archer; Mihikito Naito; Roger Ahern; John Reed; Mitchell Dowsett
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Efficacy of neoadjuvant Cisplatin in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Daniel P Silver; Andrea L Richardson; Aron C Eklund; Zhigang C Wang; Zoltan Szallasi; Qiyuan Li; Nicolai Juul; Chee-Onn Leong; Diana Calogrias; Ayodele Buraimoh; Aquila Fatima; Rebecca S Gelman; Paula D Ryan; Nadine M Tung; Arcangela De Nicolo; Shridar Ganesan; Alexander Miron; Christian Colin; Dennis C Sgroi; Leif W Ellisen; Eric P Winer; Judy E Garber
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase in tumors from BRCA mutation carriers.

Authors:  Peter C Fong; David S Boss; Timothy A Yap; Andrew Tutt; Peijun Wu; Marja Mergui-Roelvink; Peter Mortimer; Helen Swaisland; Alan Lau; Mark J O'Connor; Alan Ashworth; James Carmichael; Stan B Kaye; Jan H M Schellens; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-24       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Resistance to therapy caused by intragenic deletion in BRCA2.

Authors:  Stacey L Edwards; Rachel Brough; Christopher J Lord; Rachael Natrajan; Radost Vatcheva; Douglas A Levine; Jeff Boyd; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy.

Authors:  Hannah Farmer; Nuala McCabe; Christopher J Lord; Andrew N J Tutt; Damian A Johnson; Tobias B Richardson; Manuela Santarosa; Krystyna J Dillon; Ian Hickson; Charlotte Knights; Niall M B Martin; Stephen P Jackson; Graeme C M Smith; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 69.504

View more
  122 in total

1.  The potential for poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in cancer therapy.

Authors:  M Javle; N J Curtin
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 8.168

2.  The ups and downs of DNA repair biomarkers for PARP inhibitor therapies.

Authors:  Xiaozhe Wang; David T Weaver
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-03       Impact factor: 6.166

3.  DNA Damage Repair Inhibitor for Breast Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Ahrum Min; Kyung-Hun Lee; Seock-Ah Im
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 4.  Appraising iniparib, the PARP inhibitor that never was--what must we learn?

Authors:  Joaquin Mateo; Michael Ong; David S P Tan; Michael A Gonzalez; Johann S de Bono
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 66.675

5.  Doubling down on the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway enhances the antitumor efficacy of PARP inhibitor in triple negative breast cancer model beyond BRCA-ness.

Authors:  Pradip De; Yuling Sun; Jennifer H Carlson; Lori S Friedman; Brian R Leyland-Jones; Nandini Dey
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.715

6.  HRDetect is a predictor of BRCA1 and BRCA2 deficiency based on mutational signatures.

Authors:  Helen Davies; Dominik Glodzik; Sandro Morganella; Lucy R Yates; Johan Staaf; Xueqing Zou; Manasa Ramakrishna; Sancha Martin; Sandrine Boyault; Anieta M Sieuwerts; Peter T Simpson; Tari A King; Keiran Raine; Jorunn E Eyfjord; Gu Kong; Åke Borg; Ewan Birney; Hendrik G Stunnenberg; Marc J van de Vijver; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; John W M Martens; Paul N Span; Sunil R Lakhani; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Christos Sotiriou; Andrew Tutt; Alastair M Thompson; Steven Van Laere; Andrea L Richardson; Alain Viari; Peter J Campbell; Michael R Stratton; Serena Nik-Zainal
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 7.  DNA repair dysregulation from cancer driver to therapeutic target.

Authors:  Nicola J Curtin
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  An ex vivo assay of XRT-induced Rad51 foci formation predicts response to PARP-inhibition in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Monjri M Shah; Zachary C Dobbin; Somaira Nowsheen; Monica Wielgos; Ashwini A Katre; Ronald D Alvarez; Panagiotis A Konstantinopoulos; Eddy S Yang; Charles N Landen
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 9.  DNA Damage Response Assessments in Human Tumor Samples Provide Functional Biomarkers of Radiosensitivity.

Authors:  Henning Willers; Liliana Gheorghiu; Qi Liu; Jason A Efstathiou; Lori J Wirth; Mechthild Krause; Cläre von Neubeck
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-05-14       Impact factor: 5.934

10.  BRCA1 pathway function in basal-like breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Sarah J Hill; Allison P Clark; Daniel P Silver; David M Livingston
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.