PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine levels of depression and hopelessness and to explore the relationship between attachment security and psychosocial distress in patients with metastatic/recurrent cancer and spouse-caregivers, experiencing marital distress. METHODS: Couple-participants were from a pilot study and a larger clinical trial prior to randomization. Participation required that one partner endorsed marital distress on the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS). Outcome measures included the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), and Experiences in Close Relationships Inventory. RESULTS: Caregivers, compared with their matched ill-partners, had significantly higher scores on the RDAS (<distress) after taking sex, avoidance, and anxiety into account. Fifty-two percent of patients and 33% of caregivers scored above the BDI-II cut-off (≥ 15) for depression, with patients and females reporting higher levels of depression compared to caregivers and males. Thirty-three percent of patients and 24% of caregivers scored above the BHS cut-off (≥ 8) for hopelessness, with males and patients displaying significantly higher mean scores compared with females and caregivers. There was a significant interaction effect of sex and avoidance for RDAS; as the male avoidance subscale score increased, the female caregiver RDAS declined (>distressed). CONCLUSIONS: Marital distress may be amplified within insecure attachment bonds, especially among avoidant male patients and their female caregivers, which may influence caregiving/care-receiving. We offer unique, preliminary support for identifying couples at risk to help reduce suffering and complicated bereavement in the terminal cancer population. Further research that include larger studies, are needed to determine relationships among attachment and psychosocial outcomes.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine levels of depression and hopelessness and to explore the relationship between attachment security and psychosocial distress in patients with metastatic/recurrent cancer and spouse-caregivers, experiencing marital distress. METHODS: Couple-participants were from a pilot study and a larger clinical trial prior to randomization. Participation required that one partner endorsed marital distress on the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS). Outcome measures included the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), and Experiences in Close Relationships Inventory. RESULTS: Caregivers, compared with their matched ill-partners, had significantly higher scores on the RDAS (<distress) after taking sex, avoidance, and anxiety into account. Fifty-two percent of patients and 33% of caregivers scored above the BDI-II cut-off (≥ 15) for depression, with patients and females reporting higher levels of depression compared to caregivers and males. Thirty-three percent of patients and 24% of caregivers scored above the BHS cut-off (≥ 8) for hopelessness, with males and patients displaying significantly higher mean scores compared with females and caregivers. There was a significant interaction effect of sex and avoidance for RDAS; as the male avoidance subscale score increased, the female caregiver RDAS declined (>distressed). CONCLUSIONS: Marital distress may be amplified within insecure attachment bonds, especially among avoidant male patients and their female caregivers, which may influence caregiving/care-receiving. We offer unique, preliminary support for identifying couples at risk to help reduce suffering and complicated bereavement in the terminal cancer population. Further research that include larger studies, are needed to determine relationships among attachment and psychosocial outcomes.
Authors: Gary Rodin; Nancy Lloyd; Mark Katz; Esther Green; Jean A Mackay; Rebecca K S Wong Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2006-10-21 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: C Nijboer; R Tempelaar; R Sanderman; M Triemstra; R J Spruijt; G A van den Bos Journal: Psychooncology Date: 1998 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Linda M McLean; Jennifer M Jones; Anne C Rydall; Andrew Walsh; Mary Jane Esplen; Camilla Zimmermann; Gary M Rodin Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Laura S Porter; Francis J Keefe; Deborah Davis; Meredith Rumble; Cindy Scipio; Jennifer Garst Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2012-01-13 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Eleni Tsilika; Efi Parpa; Anna Zygogianni; Vassilios Kouloulias; Kyriaki Mystakidou Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Sarah E Van Pilsum Rasmussen; Ann Eno; Mary G Bowring; Romi Lifshitz; Jacqueline M Garonzik-Wang; Fawaz Al Ammary; Daniel C Brennan; Allan B Massie; Dorry L Segev; Macey L Henderson Journal: Transplant Direct Date: 2020-06-08