| Literature DB >> 20798862 |
Hyeon Ho Kim1, Kotb Abdelmohsen, Myriam Gorospe.
Abstract
As many DNA-damaging conditions repress transcription, posttranscriptional processes critically influence gene expression during the genotoxic stress response. The RNA-binding protein HuR robustly influences gene expression following DNA damage. HuR function is controlled in two principal ways: (1) by mobilizing HuR from the nucleus to the cytoplasm, where it modulates the stability and translation of target mRNAs and (2) by altering its association with target mRNAs. Here, we review evidence that two main effectors of ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated/ATM- and Rad3-related (ATM/ATR), the checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Chk2, jointly influence HuR function. Chk1 affects HuR localization by phosphorylating (hence inactivating) Cdk1, a kinase that phosphorylates HuR and thereby blocks HuR's cytoplasmic export. Chk2 modulates HuR binding to target mRNAs by phosphorylating HuR's RNA-recognition motifs (RRM1 and RRM2). We discuss how HuR phosphorylation by kinases including Chk1/Cdk1 and Chk2 impacts upon gene expression patterns, cell proliferation, and survival following genotoxic injury.Entities:
Year: 2010 PMID: 20798862 PMCID: PMC2925474 DOI: 10.4061/2010/981487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nucleic Acids ISSN: 2090-0201
Figure 1Sites of HuR phosphorylation by DNA damage-inducible kinases. Schematic of HuR depicting the RNA recognition motifs (RRMs, dark blue), the hinge region (brown) with the HuR nucleocytoplasmic shuttling sequence (HNS), the sites of phosphorylation (under “Phosphorylated Amino Acids”), and the DNA Damage-Regulated Kinases responsible, including an unknown kinase predicted to phosphorylate S242. The consequences of HuR phosphorylation at the different sites are indicated under “Impact on HuR Function”. More details in the text.
HuR target mRNAs showing altered expression after DNA damage. Partial list of HuR target mRNAs encoding proteins that change following DNA damage (first column), the region of interaction with HuR (second column), and the genotoxic damage that was shown to affect HuR regulation of the mRNA (third column); “n.r.”: no reported. The HuR kinases linked to the regulation of the mRNAs in the first column are indicated (fourth column).
| Target mRNA after DNA damage | Binding region | DNA damage conditions affecting regulation by HuR | HuR Kinase | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mRNA stabilization | 3′UTR | n.r. | n.r. | [−] | |
| 3′UTR | UVC, arsenite, IR | Chk2, p38 | [ | ||
| 3′UTR | H2O2 | Chk2, Cdk1 | [ | ||
| 3′UTR | H2O2 | n.r. | [ | ||
| 3′UTR | UVC | Chk2 | [ | ||
| 3′UTR | n.r. | n.r. | [−] | ||
| 3′UTR | n.r. | n.r. | [−] | ||
| 3′UTR | H2O2 | Chk2 | [ | ||
| 3′UTR | n.r. | n.r. | [−] | ||
| 3′UTR | n.r. | Cdk1 | [ | ||
| 3′UTR | n.r. | Cdk1 | [ | ||
| 3′UTR | n.r. | PKC, p38 | [ | ||
| 3′UTR | n.r. | n.r. | [−] | ||
| 3′UTR | n.r. | n.r. | [−] | ||
| 3′UTR | n.r. | n.r. | [−] | ||
| 3′UTR | H2O2 | Cdk1 | [ | ||
| ↑ Translation | 3′UTR | UVC | n.r. | [−] | |
| 3′UTR | UVC | Chk2, Cdk1 | [ | ||
| 3′UTR | n.r. | Chk2 | [ | ||
| 3′UTR | H2O2 | Cdk1 | [ | ||
| 3′UTR | n.r. | Cdk1 | [ | ||
| ↓ Translation | 5′UTR | n.r. | n.r. | [−] | |
| 5′UTR | n.r. | n.r. | [−] | ||
| 3′UTR | n.r. | n.r. | [−] | ||
| 3′UTR | n.r. | n.r. | [−] | ||
| 3′UTR | n.r. | n.r. | [−] | ||
Figure 2Regulation of HuR function by ATM/ATR → Chk1/Chk2. ATM/ATR regulates HuR function through the activation of Chk1 and Chk2. Active Chk1 phosphorylates (and hence inactivates) Cdk1, a kinase that phosphorylates HuR at S202; in turn, unphosphorylated HuR(S202) can be transported to the cytoplasm (orange). Active Chk2 phosphorylates HuR at S88, S100, and T118 (at RRM1 and RRM2); in turn, HuR association with target mRNAs is altered (purple). Jointly, ATM/ATR → Chk1/Chk2 modulates the amount of HuR in the cytoplasm and its interaction with target mRNAs (green).