Literature DB >> 20797976

A comparative analysis of biomedical research ethics regulation systems in Europe and Latin America with regard to the protection of human subjects.

Eugenia Lamas1, Marcela Ferrer, Alberto Molina, Rodrigo Salinas, Adriana Hevia, Alexandre Bota, Dafna Feinholz, Michael Fuchs, Roland Schramm, Juan-Carlos Tealdi, Sergio Zorrilla.   

Abstract

The European project European and Latin American Systems of Ethics Regulation of Biomedical Research Project (EULABOR) has carried out the first comparative analysis of ethics regulation systems for biomedical research in seven countries in Europe and Latin America, evaluating their roles in the protection of human subjects. We developed a conceptual and methodological framework defining 'ethics regulation system for biomedical research' as a set of actors, institutions, codes and laws involved in overseeing the ethics of biomedical research on humans. This framework allowed us to develop comprehensive national reports by conducting semi-structured interviews to key informants. These reports were summarised and analysed in a comparative analysis. The study showed that the regulatory framework for clinical research in these countries differ in scope. It showed that despite the different political contexts, actors involved and motivations for creating the regulation, in most of the studied countries it was the government who took the lead in setting up the system. The study also showed that Europe and Latin America are similar regarding national bodies and research ethics committees, but the Brazilian system has strong and noteworthy specificities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20797976     DOI: 10.1136/jme.2009.035097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  4 in total

1.  Twelve years of Fogarty-funded bioethics training in Latin America and the Caribbean: achievements and challenges.

Authors:  Carla Saenz; Elizabeth Heitman; Florencia Luna; Sergio Litewka; Kenneth W Goodman; Ruth Macklin
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Research Ethics in the Context of Transition: Gaps in Policies and Programs on the Protection of Research Participants in the Selected Countries of Central and Eastern Europe.

Authors:  Andrei Famenka
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  A school-based epidemiological field survey: difficulties in collecting psychiatric outcome data in a middle-income country.

Authors:  T M Fidalgo; Z M Sanchez; M Ribeiro; S R Healy; S C Caetano; S S Martins
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 3.630

4.  Culturally Competent Informed-Consent Process to Evaluate a Social Policy for Older Persons With Low Literacy: The Mexican Case.

Authors:  Emma Aguila; Beverly A Weidmer; Alfonso Rivera Illingworth; Homero Martinez
Journal:  Sage Open       Date:  2016-08-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.