BACKGROUND: There is evidence that angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is cardioprotective. To assess this in the post-myocardial infarction (MI) heart, we treated adult male Sprague-Dawley rats with either placebo (PL) or C16, a selective ACE2 inhibitor, after permanent coronary artery ligation or sham operation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Coronary artery ligation resulting in MI between 25% to 50% of the left ventricular (LV) circumference caused substantial cardiac remodeling. Daily C16 administration from postoperative days 2 to 28 at a dose that inhibited myocardial ACE2 activity was associated with a significant increase in MI size and reduction in LV % fractional shortening. Treatment with C16 did not significantly affect post-MI increases in LV end-diastolic dimension but did inhibit increases in wall thickness and fibrosis in non-infarcted LV. On postoperative day 7, C16 had no significant effect on the increased level of apoptosis in the infarct and border zones nor did it significantly affect capillary density surrounding the MI. It did, however, significantly reduce the number of c-kit(+) cells in the border region. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the notion that ACE2 exerts cardioprotective effects by preserving jeopardized cardiomyocytes in the border zone. The reduction in hypertrophy and fibrosis with C16, however, suggests that ACE2 activity has diverse effects on post-MI remodeling. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
BACKGROUND: There is evidence that angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) is cardioprotective. To assess this in the post-myocardial infarction (MI) heart, we treated adult male Sprague-Dawley rats with either placebo (PL) or C16, a selective ACE2 inhibitor, after permanent coronary artery ligation or sham operation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Coronary artery ligation resulting in MI between 25% to 50% of the left ventricular (LV) circumference caused substantial cardiac remodeling. Daily C16 administration from postoperative days 2 to 28 at a dose that inhibited myocardial ACE2 activity was associated with a significant increase in MI size and reduction in LV % fractional shortening. Treatment with C16 did not significantly affect post-MI increases in LV end-diastolic dimension but did inhibit increases in wall thickness and fibrosis in non-infarcted LV. On postoperative day 7, C16 had no significant effect on the increased level of apoptosis in the infarct and border zones nor did it significantly affect capillary density surrounding the MI. It did, however, significantly reduce the number of c-kit(+) cells in the border region. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the notion that ACE2 exerts cardioprotective effects by preserving jeopardized cardiomyocytes in the border zone. The reduction in hypertrophy and fibrosis with C16, however, suggests that ACE2 activity has diverse effects on post-MI remodeling. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: S Mankad; T A d'Amato; N Reichek; W E McGregor; J Lin; D Singh; W J Rogers; C M Kramer Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-06-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Natalie A Dales; Alexandra E Gould; James A Brown; Emily F Calderwood; Bing Guan; Charles A Minor; James M Gavin; Paul Hales; Virendar K Kaushik; Michael Stewart; Peter J Tummino; Chad S Vickers; Timothy D Ocain; Michael A Patane Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2002-10-09 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: H Jin; R Yang; T A Awad; F Wang; W Li; S P Williams; A Ogasawara; B Shimada; P M Williams; G de Feo ; N F Paoni Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-02-06 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Chad Vickers; Paul Hales; Virendar Kaushik; Larry Dick; James Gavin; Jin Tang; Kevin Godbout; Thomas Parsons; Elizabeth Baronas; Frank Hsieh; Susan Acton; Michael Patane; Andrew Nichols; Peter Tummino Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2002-01-28 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: D Orlic; J Kajstura; S Chimenti; F Limana; I Jakoniuk; F Quaini; B Nadal-Ginard; D M Bodine; A Leri; P Anversa Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2001-08-14 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Annemarieke E Loot; Anton J M Roks; Robert H Henning; René A Tio; Albert J H Suurmeijer; Frans Boomsma; Wiek H van Gilst Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-04-02 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: M Donoghue; F Hsieh; E Baronas; K Godbout; M Gosselin; N Stagliano; M Donovan; B Woolf; K Robison; R Jeyaseelan; R E Breitbart; S Acton Journal: Circ Res Date: 2000-09-01 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Michael A Crackower; Renu Sarao; Gavin Y Oudit; Chana Yagil; Ivona Kozieradzki; Sam E Scanga; Antonio J Oliveira-dos-Santos; Joan da Costa; Liyong Zhang; York Pei; James Scholey; Carlos M Ferrario; Armen S Manoukian; Mark C Chappell; Peter H Backx; Yoram Yagil; Josef M Penninger Journal: Nature Date: 2002-06-20 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Rachel Masson; Stuart A Nicklin; Margaret Anne Craig; Martin McBride; Kirsten Gilday; Paul Gregorevic; James M Allen; Jeffrey S Chamberlain; Godfrey Smith; Delyth Graham; Anna F Dominiczak; Claudio Napoli; Andrew H Baker Journal: Hypertension Date: 2009-02-16 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: G G Serneri; M Boddi; I Cecioni; S Vanni; M Coppo; M L Papa; B Bandinelli; I Bertolozzi; G Polidori; T Toscano; M Maccherini; P A Modesti Journal: Circ Res Date: 2001-05-11 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Sreedhar Bodiga; Jiu Chang Zhong; Wang Wang; Ratnadeep Basu; Jennifer Lo; George C Liu; Danny Guo; Steven M Holland; James W Scholey; Josef M Penninger; Zamaneh Kassiri; Gavin Y Oudit Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2011-02-01 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Randy T Cowling; Seon Ju Yeo; In Jai Kim; Joong Il Park; Yusu Gu; Nancy D Dalton; Kirk L Peterson; Barry H Greenberg Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2014-07-03 Impact factor: 4.733