Literature DB >> 2073869

Insulin-pen treatment, quality of life and metabolic control: retrospective intra-group evaluations.

J O Hörnquist1, A Wikby, P O Andersson, A M Dufva.   

Abstract

The significance of the insulin pen for the quality of life of patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) has been debated. The aim of this study was to empirically investigate whether quality of life and metabolic control improve and whether insulin requirements change subsequent to multiple injection-pen treatment. The study group comprised 72 consecutive outpatients with IDDM. Thirty-eight subjects had an initial daily regimen of one or two injections, and the remaining 34 subjects had three or more injections. All patients had four or five injections per day during pen treatment. Perceived changes in quality of life attributed to pen treatment were assessed retrospectively at follow-up 9-13 months after the changeover. Data on metabolic control (HbA1c) and insulin dose were collected at base-line and follow-up. The life quality of the IDDM-patients improved consistently, a finding corroborated by recent studies with other designs and methods. Metabolic control improved only for those patients who previously had one or two injections. The insulin requirements did not change. In conclusion, the pen contributes to a better life for the IDDM patient. The quality of life changes due to treatment intervention appear to be assessable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2073869     DOI: 10.1016/0168-8227(90)90065-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract        ISSN: 0168-8227            Impact factor:   5.602


  19 in total

1.  Quality-of-life evaluation in diabetes.

Authors:  C Eiser; J E Tooke
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 2.  Quality of life in type II diabetes: evaluation and applications.

Authors:  C Eiser; J E Tooke
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 4.981

3.  Comparison of intuitiveness, ease of use, and preference in two insulin pens.

Authors:  Toshinari Asakura; Klaus H Jensen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-03-01

4.  Needle with a novel attachment versus conventional screw-thread needles: a preference and usability test among adults with diabetes and impaired manual dexterity.

Authors:  Birtha Hansen; Søren K Lilleøre; Gitte Ter-Borch
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 6.118

Review 5.  What can we learn from patient-reported outcomes of insulin pen devices?

Authors:  Barbara J Anderson; Maria J Redondo
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

6.  Differences in the dose accuracy of insulin pens.

Authors:  Heike Hänel; Alexander Weise; Wei Sun; Johannes W Pfützner; Nicole Thomé; Andreas Pfützner
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-05

7.  Quality of life: status and change (QLsc) reliability, validity and sensitivity of a generic assessment approach tailored for diabetes.

Authors:  J O Hörnquist; A Wikby; B Hansson; P O Andersson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Comparative Assessment of Lixisenatide, Exenatide, and Liraglutide Pen Devices: A Pilot User-Based Study.

Authors:  Udo Stauder; Diplom Enginee; Hina Elton; Alfred Penfornis; Steve Edelman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-01-01

9.  Severity of disease and quality of life: a comparison in patients with cancer and benign disease.

Authors:  J O Hörnquist; B Hansson; I Akerlind; J Larsson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Change and status in quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  P Bendtsen; J O Hörnquist
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.