Literature DB >> 20738392

Towards optimised information about clinical trials; identification and validation of key issues in collaboration with cancer patient advocates.

P Dellson1, M Nilbert, P-O Bendahl, P Malmström, C Carlsson.   

Abstract

Clinical trials are crucial to improve cancer treatment but recruitment is difficult. Optimised patient information has been recognised as a key issue. In line with the increasing focus on patients' perspectives in health care, we aimed to study patients' opinions about the written information used in three clinical trials for breast cancer. Primary data collection was done in focus group interviews with breast cancer patient advocates. Content analysis identified three major themes: comprehensibility, emotions and associations, and decision making. Based on the advocates' suggestions for improvements, 21 key issues were defined and validated through a questionnaire in an independent group of breast cancer patient advocates. Clear messages, emotionally neutral expressions, careful descriptions of side effects, clear comparisons between different treatment alternatives and information about the possibility to discontinue treatment were perceived as the most important issues. Patients' views of the information in clinical trials provide new insights and identify key issues to consider in optimising future written information and may improve recruitment to clinical cancer trials.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20738392     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2010.01207.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  6 in total

1.  Improved clinical trial enrollments for uterine leiomyosarcoma patients after gynecologic oncology partnership with a sarcoma center.

Authors:  S E S Lange; J Liu; D R Adkins; M A Powell; B A Van Tine; D G Mutch
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 2.  Promoting Scientist-Advocate Collaborations in Cancer Research: Why and How.

Authors:  Jeannine M Salamone; Wanda Lucas; Shelley B Brundage; Jamie N Holloway; Sherri M Stahl; Nora E Carbine; Margery London; Naomi Greenwood; Rosa Goyes; Deborah Charles Chisholm; Erin Price; Roberta Carlin; Susan Winarsky; Kirsten B Baker; Julia Maues; Ayesha N Shajahan-Haq
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Patients' reasoning regarding the decision to participate in clinical cancer trials: an interview study.

Authors:  Pia Dellson; Kerstin Nilsson; Helena Jernström; Christina Carlsson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Factors that impact on recruitment to randomised trials in health care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Authors:  Catherine Houghton; Maura Dowling; Pauline Meskell; Andrew Hunter; Heidi Gardner; Aislinn Conway; Shaun Treweek; Katy Sutcliffe; Jane Noyes; Declan Devane; Jane R Nicholas; Linda M Biesty
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-10-07

5.  Patient representatives' views on patient information in clinical cancer trials.

Authors:  Pia Dellson; Mef Nilbert; Christina Carlsson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Current trends in patient and public involvement in cancer research: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kathrine Hoffmann Pii; Lone Helle Schou; Karin Piil; Mary Jarden
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 3.377

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.