Literature DB >> 20736744

Detection of TMPRSS2 gene deletions and translocations in carcinoma, intraepithelial neoplasia, and normal epithelium of the prostate by direct fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Shengle Zhang1, Brian Pavlovitz, Jamie Tull, Yan Wang, Fang-Ming Deng, Christine Fuller.   

Abstract

TMPRSS2 gene fusions with ETS transcription factor family members ERG, ETV1, or ETV4 have been recently discovered as a common molecular event in prostate cancer. Much attention has been focused on exploring their clinical application as a genetic tumor marker for the diagnosis, prognosis, and prediction of response to therapy. Although several studies have been done, the clinical utility of TMPRSS2 genetic alterations as biomarkers for prostate carcinoma remains indeterminate. In this study, we examined adenocarcinomas, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and normal epithelium of the prostate retrieved from radical prostatectomy specimens to determine the frequency, specificity, tissue heterogeneity, and prognostic value of TMPRSS2 genetic alterations using a direct-labeled TMPRSS2 dual-color break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probe cocktail designed to detect all known TMPRSS2-associated deletions or translocations. Seventy-one patients (161 samples) with normal prostate tissue, 60 patients (153 samples) with PIN, and 61 patients (142 samples) with carcinoma in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue microarrays were tested. None of the 161 normal prostate samples showed TMPRSS2 translocation or deletion. Sixty-two percent patients of prostate carcinomas demonstrated TMPRSS2 gene alterations, including 39% with translocation, 16% with deletion, and 7% with a mixed pattern. Tissue heterogeneity for TMPRSS2 gene alterations was identified in 28% of prostate carcinomas. No difference in the frequency of TMPRSS2 gene alterations was found between Gleason 6 and 7 tumors. Seventeen percent of PIN had TMPRSS2 gene alterations and showed the same FISH patterns as in the carcinomas from respective prostatectomy specimens. The TMPRSS2 dual-color break-apart FISH probe cocktail provides a simple and reliable method for the detection of TMPRSS2-related genetic alterations in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. TMPRSS2 genetic alterations detectable by this method are strictly restricted in prostate neoplasia, and can be identified in the majority of prostate carcinomas. Tissue heterogeneity for TMPRSS2 alterations is common, and it should be considered when sampling and evaluating biopsy specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20736744     DOI: 10.1097/PDM.0b013e3181bb216a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Mol Pathol        ISSN: 1052-9551


  13 in total

1.  ERG-TMPRSS2 rearrangement is shared by concurrent prostatic adenocarcinoma and prostatic small cell carcinoma and absent in small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder: evidence supporting monoclonal origin.

Authors:  Sean R Williamson; Shaobo Zhang; Jorge L Yao; Jiaoti Huang; Antonio Lopez-Beltran; Steven Shen; Adeboye O Osunkoya; Gregory T MacLennan; Rodolfo Montironi; Liang Cheng
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 7.842

2.  The TMPRSS2:ERG rearrangement, ERG expression, and prostate cancer outcomes: a cohort study and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Pettersson; Rebecca E Graff; Scott R Bauer; Michael J Pitt; Rosina T Lis; Edward C Stack; Neil E Martin; Lauren Kunz; Kathryn L Penney; Azra H Ligon; Catherine Suppan; Richard Flavin; Howard D Sesso; Jennifer R Rider; Christopher Sweeney; Meir J Stampfer; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Philip W Kantoff; Martin G Sanda; Edward L Giovannucci; Eric L Ding; Massimo Loda; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Clinically relevant genetic characterization of prostate tumors: how close are we to the goal?

Authors:  Yuri Tolkach; Florian Imkamp; Konstantin Godin; Hendrik Van Poppel
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-01-30

4.  Utility of PTEN and ERG immunostaining for distinguishing high-grade PIN from intraductal carcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy.

Authors:  Carlos L Morais; Jeong S Han; Jennifer Gordetsky; Michael S Nagar; Ann E Anderson; Stephen Lee; Jessica L Hicks; Ming Zhou; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Rajal B Shah; Jonathan I Epstein; Angelo M De Marzo; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 5.  The oncogene ERG: a key factor in prostate cancer.

Authors:  P Adamo; M R Ladomery
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 9.867

6.  Antibody-based detection of ERG rearrangements in prostate core biopsies, including diagnostically challenging cases: ERG staining in prostate core biopsies.

Authors:  Scott A Tomlins; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Javed Siddiqui; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Lakshmi P Kunju
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.534

7.  A novel four-color fluorescence in situ hybridization assay for the detection of TMPRSS2 and ERG rearrangements in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Qu; Grace Randhawa; Cynthia Friedman; Siobhan O'Hara-Larrivee; Kathleen Kroeger; Ruth Dumpit; Larry True; Funda Vakar-Lopez; Christopher Porter; Robert Vessella; Peter Nelson; Min Fang
Journal:  Cancer Genet       Date:  2013-01-24

Review 8.  Evaluation of the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion for the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yanhong Yao; Haitao Wang; BaoGuo Li; Yong Tang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-10-20

9.  Heterogeneity of ERG expression in prostate cancer: a large section mapping study of entire prostatectomy specimens from 125 patients.

Authors:  Maria-Christina Tsourlakis; Annegret Stender; Alexander Quaas; Martina Kluth; Corinna Wittmer; Alexander Haese; Markus Graefen; Stefan Steurer; Ronald Simon; Jan Korbel; Joachim Weischenfeldt; Hartwig Huland; Guido Sauter; Thorsten Schlomm; Sarah Minner
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Cytoplasmic PTEN protein loss distinguishes intraductal carcinoma of the prostate from high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Tamara L Lotan; Berrak Gumuskaya; Hameed Rahimi; Jessica L Hicks; Tsuyoshi Iwata; Brian D Robinson; Jonathan I Epstein; Angelo M De Marzo
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 7.842

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.