CONTEXT: Fusions of androgen-regulated genes and v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (avian) (ERG) occur in approximately 50% of prostate cancers, encoding a truncated ERG product. In prostatectomy specimens, ERG rearrangements are greater than 99% specific for prostate cancer or high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia adjacent to ERG-rearranged prostate cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ERG staining by immunohistochemistry on needle biopsies, including diagnostically challenging cases. DESIGN: Biopsies from a retrospective cohort (n = 111) enriched in cores requiring diagnostic immunohistochemistry and a prospective cohort from all cases during 3 months (n = 311) were stained with an anti-ERG antibody (clone EPR3864). RESULTS: Among evaluable cores (n = 418), ERG staining was confined to cancerous epithelium (71 of 160 cores; 44%), high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (12 of 68 cores; 18%), and atypical foci (3 of 28 cores; 11%), with staining in only 2 of 162 cores (1%) diagnosed as benign. The ERG was expressed in about 5 morphologically benign glands across 418 cores and was uniformly expressed by all cancerous glands in 70 of 71 cores (99%). CONCLUSIONS: ERG staining is more prostate cancer-specific than α-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase, and staining in an atypical focus supports a diagnosis of cancer if high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia can be excluded. Thus, ERG staining shows utility in diagnostically challenging biopsies and may be useful in molecularly subtyping prostate cancer and in stratifying isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia by risk of subsequent cancer.
CONTEXT: Fusions of androgen-regulated genes and v-ets erythroblastosis virus E26 oncogene homolog (avian) (ERG) occur in approximately 50% of prostate cancers, encoding a truncated ERG product. In prostatectomy specimens, ERG rearrangements are greater than 99% specific for prostate cancer or high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia adjacent to ERG-rearranged prostate cancer by fluorescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ERG staining by immunohistochemistry on needle biopsies, including diagnostically challenging cases. DESIGN: Biopsies from a retrospective cohort (n = 111) enriched in cores requiring diagnostic immunohistochemistry and a prospective cohort from all cases during 3 months (n = 311) were stained with an anti-ERG antibody (clone EPR3864). RESULTS: Among evaluable cores (n = 418), ERG staining was confined to cancerous epithelium (71 of 160 cores; 44%), high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (12 of 68 cores; 18%), and atypical foci (3 of 28 cores; 11%), with staining in only 2 of 162 cores (1%) diagnosed as benign. The ERG was expressed in about 5 morphologically benign glands across 418 cores and was uniformly expressed by all cancerous glands in 70 of 71 cores (99%). CONCLUSIONS:ERG staining is more prostate cancer-specific than α-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase, and staining in an atypical focus supports a diagnosis of cancer if high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia can be excluded. Thus, ERG staining shows utility in diagnostically challenging biopsies and may be useful in molecularly subtyping prostate cancer and in stratifying isolated high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia by risk of subsequent cancer.
Authors: Bo Han; Rohit Mehra; Saravana M Dhanasekaran; Jindan Yu; Anjana Menon; Robert J Lonigro; Xiaosong Wang; Yusong Gong; Lei Wang; Sunita Shankar; Bharathi Laxman; Rajal B Shah; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Scott A Tomlins; Chandan Kumar-Sinha; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2008-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Bo Han; Rohit Mehra; Robert J Lonigro; Lei Wang; Khalid Suleman; Anjana Menon; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Scott A Tomlins; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Rajal B Shah Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2009-05-01 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Brett S Carver; Jennifer Tran; Anuradha Gopalan; Zhenbang Chen; Safa Shaikh; Arkaitz Carracedo; Andrea Alimonti; Caterina Nardella; Shohreh Varmeh; Peter T Scardino; Carlos Cordon-Cardo; William Gerald; Pier Paolo Pandolfi Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2009-04-26 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Dorothee Pflueger; David S Rickman; Andrea Sboner; Sven Perner; Christopher J LaFargue; Maria A Svensson; Benjamin J Moss; Naoki Kitabayashi; Yihang Pan; Alexandre de la Taille; Rainer Kuefer; Ashutosh K Tewari; Francesca Demichelis; Mark S Chee; Mark B Gerstein; Mark A Rubin Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: Jennifer C King; Jin Xu; John Wongvipat; Haley Hieronymus; Brett S Carver; David H Leung; Barry S Taylor; Chris Sander; Robert D Cardiff; Suzana S Couto; William L Gerald; Charles L Sawyers Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2009-04-26 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Sunita R Setlur; Kirsten D Mertz; Yujin Hoshida; Francesca Demichelis; Mathieu Lupien; Sven Perner; Andrea Sboner; Yudi Pawitan; Ove Andrén; Laura A Johnson; Jeff Tang; Hans-Olov Adami; Stefano Calza; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Daniel Rhodes; Scott Tomlins; Katja Fall; Lorelei A Mucci; Philip W Kantoff; Meir J Stampfer; Swen-Olof Andersson; Eberhard Varenhorst; Jan-Erik Johansson; Myles Brown; Todd R Golub; Mark A Rubin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-05-27 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Ramy A Abdelsalam; Ibrahim Khalifeh; Alan Box; Maria Kalantarian; Sunita Ghosh; Hatem Abou-Ouf; Tamara Lotfi; Mohammed Shahait; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Tarek A Bismar Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Alba Torres; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Scott A Tomlins; Nicholas Erho; Ewan A Gibb; Jijumon Chelliserry; Lony Lim; Lucia L C Lam; Sheila F Faraj; Stephania M Bezerra; Elai Davicioni; Kasra Yousefi; Ashley E Ross; George J Netto; Edward M Schaeffer; Tamara L Lotan Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Kimberly A Zuhlke; Anna M Johnson; Scott A Tomlins; Nallasivam Palanisamy; John D Carpten; Ethan M Lange; William B Isaacs; Kathleen A Cooney Journal: Prostate Date: 2014-05-06 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Scott A Tomlins; Mohammed Alshalalfa; Elai Davicioni; Nicholas Erho; Kasra Yousefi; Shuang Zhao; Zaid Haddad; Robert B Den; Adam P Dicker; Bruce J Trock; Angelo M DeMarzo; Ashley E Ross; Edward M Schaeffer; Eric A Klein; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; R Jeffrey Karnes; Robert B Jenkins; Felix Y Feng Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Ganesh S Palapattu; Simpa S Salami; Andi K Cani; Daniel H Hovelson; Lorena Lazo de la Vega; Kelly R Vandenberg; Jarred V Bratley; Chia-Jen Liu; Lakshmi P Kunju; Jeffery S Montgomery; Todd M Morgan; Shyam Natarajan; Jiaoti Huang; Scott A Tomlins; Leonard S Marks Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Carlos L Morais; Liana B Guedes; Jessica Hicks; Alexander S Baras; Angelo M De Marzo; Tamara L Lotan Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2016-05-14 Impact factor: 3.466
Authors: Maha Hussain; Stephanie Daignault-Newton; Przemyslaw W Twardowski; Costantine Albany; Mark N Stein; Lakshmi P Kunju; Javed Siddiqui; Yi-Mi Wu; Dan Robinson; Robert J Lonigro; Xuhong Cao; Scott A Tomlins; Rohit Mehra; Kathleen A Cooney; Bruce Montgomery; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Daniel H Shevrin; Paul G Corn; Young E Whang; David C Smith; Megan V Caram; Karen E Knudsen; Walter M Stadler; Felix Y Feng; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 44.544