Literature DB >> 20736671

Taking note of the perceived value and impact of medical student chart documentation on education and patient care.

Erica Friedman1, Michelle Sainte, Robert Fallar.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the extent of restrictions to medical student documentation in patients' records and the opinions of medical education leaders about such restrictions' impact on medical student education and patient care.
METHOD: Education deans (n = 126) of medical schools in the United States and Canada were surveyed to determine policies regarding placement of medical student notes in the patient record, the value of medical students' documentation in the medical record, and the use of electronic medical records (EMRs) for patient notes. The instrument was a 23-item anonymous Web survey.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine deans responded. Over 90% believed student notes belong in medical records, but only 42% had a policy regarding this. Ninety-three percent indicated that without student notes, student education would be negatively affected. Fewer (56%) indicated that patient care would be negatively affected. Most thought limiting students' notes would negatively affect several other issues: feeling a part of the team (96%), preparation for internship (95%), and students' sense of involvement (94%). Half (52%) reported that fourth-year students could place notes in paper charts at "all" affiliated hospitals, and 6% reported that fourth-year students could do so at "no" hospitals.
CONCLUSIONS: Although students' ability to enter notes in patients' records is believed to be important for student education, only about half of all hospitals allow all students' notes in the EMR. Policies regarding placement of student notes should be implemented to ensure students' competency in note writing and their value as members of the patient care team.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20736671     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181eac1e0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  15 in total

1.  Report of the 2014-2015 Professional Affairs Standing Committee: Producing Practice-Ready Pharmacy Graduates in an Era of Value-Based Health Care.

Authors:  Charles T Taylor; Alex J Adams; Erin L Albert; Elizabeth A Cardello; Kalin Clifford; Jay D Currie; Michael Gonyeau; Steven P Nelson; Lynette R Bradley-Baker
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-10-25       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  An Electronic Medical Record in Pediatric Medical Education: Survey of Medical Students' Expectations and Experiences.

Authors:  Daryl R Cheng; Thomas Scodellaro; Wonie Uahwatanasakul; Mike South
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Electronic health records: how will students learn if they can't practice?

Authors:  Christine Matson; Mark Stephens; Beat Steiner; Stanley M Kozakowski
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Pharmacy school survey standards revisited.

Authors:  Károly Mészáros; Mitchell J Barnett; Russell V Lenth; Katherine K Knapp
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Rethinking the discharge summary: a focus on handoff communication.

Authors:  Leslie A Lenert; Farrant H Sakaguchi; Charlene R Weir
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  Collaborating for Competency-A Model for Single Electronic Health Record Onboarding for Medical Students Rotating among Separate Health Systems.

Authors:  Anne G Pereira; Michael Kim; Marcus Seywerd; Brooke Nesbitt; Michael B Pitt
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.342

7.  Pupil Prose Appraisal: Four Practical Solutions to Medical Student Documentation and Feedback in the Emergency Department.

Authors:  Mark F Olaf
Journal:  AEM Educ Train       Date:  2019-09-12

8.  Incorporating students into clinic may be associated with both improved clinical productivity and educational value.

Authors:  Jeremy A Tanner; Karthik T Rao; Rachel E Salas; Roy E Strowd; Angeline M Nguyen; Alexandra Kornbluh; Evan Mead-Brewer; Charlene E Gamaldo
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2017-12

9.  Improved Medical Student Engagement with EHR Documentation following the 2018 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Billing Changes.

Authors:  Lindsay A Stevens; Natalie M Pageler; Jin S Hahn
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 2.762

10.  Discrepancies between perceptions of students and deans regarding the consequences of restricting students' use of electronic medical records on quality of medical education.

Authors:  Ivan Solarte; Karen D Könings
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.