Literature DB >> 2073496

Occupation, cadmium exposure, and prostate cancer.

N A Elghany1, M C Schumacher, M L Slattery, D W West, J S Lee.   

Abstract

A population-based case-control study was used to investigate associations between prostate cancer and cadmium exposure, longest industry held, and longest occupation held. The study included 358 men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and 679 control men identified from the Utah population. Occupational exposures to cadmium were ascertained from self-reported data, through several a priori suspect industries and occupations, through an occupation-exposure linkage system, and through dietary food frequency questionnaires. Overall, cadmium exposure appeared to result in a small increased relative risk for prostate cancer, most apparent for aggressive tumors (OR = 1.7, CI = 1.0-3.1 for any occupational exposure, high dietary intake, or smoking cigarettes). Cases were more likely to have worked in the following industries: mining, paper and wood, medicine and science, and entertainment and recreation. Among men younger than 67, cases were also more likely to have worked in the food and tobacco industries (OR = 3.6, CI = 1.0-12.8). Cases were less likely to have worked in industries involved with glass, clay and stone, or rubber, plastics, and synthetics. Men employed as janitors and in other building service occupations showed increased relative risk for aggressive tumors (OR = 7.0, CI = 2.5-19.6). Agricultural occupations did not appear to be related to prostate cancer, although an increased relative risk for aggressive tumors was detected among younger men (OR = 2.6, CI = 0.6-12.1).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2073496     DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199003000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  26 in total

1.  Risk of mortality, cancer incidence, and stroke in a population potentially exposed to cadmium.

Authors:  P Elliott; R Arnold; S Cockings; N Eaton; L Järup; J Jones; M Quinn; M Rosato; I Thornton; M Toledano; E Tristan; J Wakefield
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 2.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-DNA adduct formation in prostate carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Benjamin A Rybicki; Nora L Nock; Adnan T Savera; Deliang Tang; Andrew Rundle
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2005-09-09       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 3.  Prostate cancer in the elderly.

Authors:  Hatzimouratidis Konstantinos
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 4.  Prostate cancer: 3. Individual risk factors.

Authors:  R P Gallagher; N Fleshner
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-10-06       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Nutrition and prostate cancer.

Authors:  L N Kolonel
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  A case-control study of farming and prostate cancer in African-American and Caucasian men.

Authors:  Tamra E Meyer; Ann L Coker; Maureen Sanderson; Elaine Symanski
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 7.  Insulin: a novel agent in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hanumanthappa Nandeesha
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-07-30       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Metabolic syndrome in sub-Saharan Africa: "smaller twin" of a region's prostatic diseases?

Authors:  Chukwunonso E C C Ejike; Lawrence U S Ezeanyika
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008-02-21       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Occupation, physical activity, and risk of prostate cancer in Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Authors:  A W Hsing; J K McLaughlin; W Zheng; Y T Gao; W J Blot
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.506

10.  Prostate cancer trends in Canada: rising incidence or increased detection?

Authors:  I G Levy; L Gibbons; J P Collins; D G Perkins; Y Mao
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1993-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.