Literature DB >> 20734422

Role of secondary cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer relapse: who will benefit? A systematic analysis of 240 consecutive patients.

Jalid Sehouli1, R Richter, Elena Ioana Braicu, Kai J Bühling, Marcus Bahra, Peter Neuhaus, Werner Lichtenegger, Christina Fotopoulou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In contrast to primary ovarian cancer, the value of surgery in relapsed-OC (ROC) remains unclear. We evaluated surgical and clinical outcome of secondary cytoreduction in ROC.
METHODS: All consecutive ROC patients who underwent secondary tumor-debulking surgery were systematically analyzed as based on a validated intraoperative documentation tool. Tumor dissemination pattern, operative and clinical outcome were evaluated. Cox-regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of mortality.
RESULTS: Between 09/2000 and 10/2008, 240 operations were evaluated; 184 patients (81.1%) were platinum-sensitive and 43 (20%) platinum-resistant. 47.5% of the patients had ascites, while 85.8% presented a multifocal tumor dissemination pattern. In 53.8% a complete tumor resection was achieved; in another 24.2%, postoperative tumor residuals were < 1 cm. In multivariate analysis, no tumor resection (HR: 7.6; 95% CI: 2.9-19.9), ascites > 500 ml (HR: 6.76; 95% CI: 3.77-12.1), platinum resistance (HR: 3.1; 95% CI: 1.26-7.7), and initial FIGO stage IV (HR: 2.86; 95% CI: 1.16-7) were the most significant risk factors for mortality. Median OS was 42.3 months (95% CI: 24.37-60.2); 17.7 months (95% CI: 12.27-23.13); and 7.7 months (95% CI: 3.1-12.3) for patients with complete tumor resection, tumor residuals ≤ 1 and > 1 cm, respectively (trend P-value < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Absence of ascites, platinum-sensitivity, initial FIGO stage < IV, and complete tumor resection correlate with a significantly better long-term prognosis after ROC surgery. However, a significant trend of continuously improving survival associated with increasing tumor reduction rates could be identified even in patients where a complete tumor resection is not achievable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20734422     DOI: 10.1002/jso.21652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  21 in total

1.  The role of secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers: a comparative effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Chi-Mu Chuang; Yiing-Jeng Chou; Ming-Shyen Yen; Kuan-Chong Chao; Nae-Fang Twu; Hua-Hsi Wu; Kuo-Chang Wen; Yi-Jen Chen; Peng-Hui Wang; Chung-Ru Lai; Pesus Chou
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-05-16

2.  Recent progress in the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Danijela Jelovac; Deborah K Armstrong
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Proposal for selection criteria of secondary cytoreductive surgery in recurrent epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers.

Authors:  Takeo Minaguchi; Toyomi Satoh; Koji Matsumoto; Manabu Sakurai; Hiroyuki Ochi; Mamiko Onuki; Akinori Oki; Hiroyuki Yoshikawa
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  S3-Guideline on Diagnostics, Therapy and Follow-up of Malignant Ovarian Tumours: Short version 1.0 - AWMF registration number: 032/035OL, June 2013.

Authors:  U Wagner; P Harter; F Hilpert; S Mahner; A Reuß; A du Bois; E Petru; W Meier; P Ortner; K König; K Lindel; D Grab; P Piso; O Ortmann; I Runnebaum; J Pfisterer; D Lüftner; N Frickhofen; F Grünwald; B O Maier; J Diebold; S Hauptmann; F Kommoss; G Emons; B Radeleff; M Gebhardt; N Arnold; G Calaminus; I Weisse; J Weis; J Sehouli; D Fink; A Burges; A Hasenburg; C Eggert
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

5.  Statement of the AGO Kommission Ovar, AGO Study Group, NOGGO, AGO Austria and AGO Switzerland Regarding the Use of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  P Harter; A du Bois; S Mahner; J Pfisterer; O Ortmann; C Marth; D Fink; F Hilpert; U Wagner; J Sehouli
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Survival Impact of Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer in an Asian Population.

Authors:  Rani Akhil Bhat; Yin Nin Chia; Yong Kuei Lim; Kwai Lam Yam; Cindy Lim; Melissa Teo
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2015-09

7.  Prognostic impact of neuroendocrine differentiation in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  E T Taube; C Denkert; K Pietzner; M Dietel; J Sehouli; S Darb-Esfahani
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-12-19       Impact factor: 4.064

8.  Benefits of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in secondary cytoreductive surgery for patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  P Peng; Z H Zhu; Z J Zhong; K Zheng; J X Yang; D Y Cao; K Shen
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Surgery for relapsed ovarian cancer: when should it be offered?

Authors:  Philipp Harter; Florian Heitz; Andreas du Bois
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.075

10.  Preoperative low hematocrit is an adverse prognostic biomarker in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Junchen Chen; Yi Li; Heng Cui
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2020-10-03       Impact factor: 2.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.