Takeo Minaguchi1, Toyomi Satoh2, Koji Matsumoto2, Manabu Sakurai2, Hiroyuki Ochi2, Mamiko Onuki2, Akinori Oki2, Hiroyuki Yoshikawa2. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan. minaguchit@md.tsukuba.ac.jp. 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennoudai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8575, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in recurrent ovarian cancer are yet to be defined. The aim of this study was to propose the selection criteria through identifying predictive factors for successful SCS. METHODS: All patients who underwent SCS for recurrent epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers between 1982 and 2012 at our institution were identified through our database. Potential prognostic factors were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses. Survival after SCS was examined by the grouping model based on the number of prognostic factors. RESULTS: We performed SCS in 80 consecutive patients, 48 (60 %) of whom achieved complete resection. Complete/incomplete resection significantly influenced survival (median 65 vs. 26 months; p = 0.0005). Among favorable prognostic factors determined before SCS, treatment-free interval >12 months, absent distant metastasis, solitary disease, and performance status 0 were independently associated with better survival (p = 0.0009, 0.00003, 0.0004, and 0.015, respectively). Patients with 3-4 of those factors had better survival than those with 2 or 0-1 factors (median 79, 26, and 19 months; p < 0.00001 and <0.0000000001, respectively). Complete resection of visible tumors was achieved in 79 % of patients with 3-4 factors, in 40 % of those with 2 factors, and in 33 % of those with 0-1 factor. Importantly, even when tumor removal was incomplete at SCS, median survival of patients with 3-4 factors was still quite favorable (83 vs. 67.5 months for complete/incomplete resection, respectively), while those of patients with 2 factors (41 vs. 25 months) and 0-1 factor (19 vs. 19 months) were not. CONCLUSION: We strongly recommend SCS for patients with 3-4 of the above favorable factors at recurrence. As for patients with 2 factors, SCS may be considered if complete resection is expected to be achieved. Prospective studies are warranted to validate our proposal.
BACKGROUND: The selection criteria for secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in recurrent ovarian cancer are yet to be defined. The aim of this study was to propose the selection criteria through identifying predictive factors for successful SCS. METHODS: All patients who underwent SCS for recurrent epithelial ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers between 1982 and 2012 at our institution were identified through our database. Potential prognostic factors were evaluated in univariate and multivariate analyses. Survival after SCS was examined by the grouping model based on the number of prognostic factors. RESULTS: We performed SCS in 80 consecutive patients, 48 (60 %) of whom achieved complete resection. Complete/incomplete resection significantly influenced survival (median 65 vs. 26 months; p = 0.0005). Among favorable prognostic factors determined before SCS, treatment-free interval >12 months, absent distant metastasis, solitary disease, and performance status 0 were independently associated with better survival (p = 0.0009, 0.00003, 0.0004, and 0.015, respectively). Patients with 3-4 of those factors had better survival than those with 2 or 0-1 factors (median 79, 26, and 19 months; p < 0.00001 and <0.0000000001, respectively). Complete resection of visible tumors was achieved in 79 % of patients with 3-4 factors, in 40 % of those with 2 factors, and in 33 % of those with 0-1 factor. Importantly, even when tumor removal was incomplete at SCS, median survival of patients with 3-4 factors was still quite favorable (83 vs. 67.5 months for complete/incomplete resection, respectively), while those of patients with 2 factors (41 vs. 25 months) and 0-1 factor (19 vs. 19 months) were not. CONCLUSION: We strongly recommend SCS for patients with 3-4 of the above favorable factors at recurrence. As for patients with 2 factors, SCS may be considered if complete resection is expected to be achieved. Prospective studies are warranted to validate our proposal.
Authors: Gavin C E Stuart; Henry Kitchener; Monica Bacon; Andreas duBois; Michael Friedlander; Jonathan Ledermann; Christian Marth; Tate Thigpen; Edward Trimble Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Philipp Harter; Jalid Sehouli; Alexander Reuss; Annette Hasenburg; Giovanni Scambia; David Cibula; Sven Mahner; Ignace Vergote; Alexander Reinthaller; Alexander Burges; Lars Hanker; Martin Pölcher; Christian Kurzeder; Ulrich Canzler; Karl Ulrich Petry; Andreas Obermair; Edgar Petru; Barbara Schmalfeldt; Domenica Lorusso; Andreas du Bois Journal: Int J Gynecol Cancer Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.437
Authors: Dennis S Chi; Kristina McCaughty; John P Diaz; Jae Huh; Sarah Schwabenbauer; Amanda J Hummer; Ennapadam S Venkatraman; Carol Aghajanian; Yukio Sonoda; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Richard R Barakat Journal: Cancer Date: 2006-05-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: R Y Zang; P Harter; D S Chi; J Sehouli; R Jiang; C G Tropé; A Ayhan; G Cormio; Y Xing; K M Wollschlaeger; E I Braicu; C A Rabbitt; H Oksefjell; W J Tian; C Fotopoulou; J Pfisterer; A du Bois; J S Berek Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2011-08-30 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: U Wagner; C Marth; R Largillier; J Kaern; C Brown; M Heywood; T Bonaventura; I Vergote; M C Piccirillo; R Fossati; V Gebski; E P Lauraine Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-07-26 Impact factor: 7.640