Literature DB >> 20733459

Quality in obstetric care: measuring what matters.

Vanitha Janakiraman1, Jeffrey Ecker.   

Abstract

Quality measures allow providers, payers, and patients to assess and compare the performance of medical teams. The ideal quality measure is easy to define and observe, important to patients and physicians, and identifies areas ripe for improvement. There are several challenges unique to obstetrics that complicate quality measurement. Nationally available data are flawed and limited. Adverse outcomes are rare and difficult to compare between groups. An appropriate emphasis on teamwork makes assigning outcomes to individuals improper and impractical. We suggest some strategies that address these challenges and may improve obstetric measures: applying measures to teams rather than individuals, using sentinel events for internal root cause analysis rather than comparisons between groups, devising measures that account for alternatives, and developing data-collection fields that address important quality metrics directly. We highlight four measures that meet these criteria: 1) elective delivery before 39 weeks of gestation, 2) prophylactic antibiotic use for cesarean delivery, 3) the Adverse Outcome Index, and 4) the nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean delivery rate. We suggest that each institution evaluate local priorities, select a measure, then continue to refine measures based on feedback from frontline clinicians.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20733459     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ea4d4f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  15 in total

1.  A perinatal care quality and safety initiative: are there financial rewards for improved quality?

Authors:  Katy B Kozhimannil; Samantha A Sommerness; Phillip Rauk; Rebecca Gams; Charles Hirt; Stanley Davis; Kristi K Miller; Daniel V Landers
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2013-08

2.  The utility of ICD9-CM codes in identifying induction of labor.

Authors:  Lisa D Levine; Meghana Limaye; Sindhu K Srinivas
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 1.862

3.  The relationship between the rising cesarean delivery and postpartum readmission rates.

Authors:  M A Clapp; J N Robinson; S E Little
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Factors associated with increased cesarean risk among African American women: evidence from California, 2010.

Authors:  Marco Huesch; Jason N Doctor
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Admission hypothermia, neonatal morbidity, and mortality: evaluation of a multicenter cohort of very low birth weight preterm infants according to relative performance of the center.

Authors:  Jamil Pedro de Siqueira Caldas; Walusa A G Ferri; Sérgio T M Marba; Davi C Aragon; Ruth Guinsburg; Maria F B de Almeida; Edna M A Diniz; Rita C S Silveira; José M S Alves Junior; Marco B Pavanelli; Maria R Bentlin; Daniela M L M Ferreira; Marynéa S Vale; Humberto H Fiori; José L M B Duarte; Jucille A Meneses; Silvia Cwajg; Werther B Carvalho; Lígia S L Ferrari; Nathalia M M Silva; Regina P G V C da Silva; Leni M Anchieta; Juliana P F Santos; Mandira D Kawakami
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.183

6.  Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues.

Authors:  Katy Backes Kozhimannil; Michael R Law; Beth A Virnig
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.301

7.  Risk-adjusted operative delivery rates and maternal-neonatal outcomes as measures of quality assessment in obstetric care: a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Maso; Lorenzo Monasta; Monica Piccoli; Luca Ronfani; Marcella Montico; Francesco De Seta; Sara Parolin; Caterina Businelli; Laura Travan; Salvatore Alberico
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Maternal near miss and mortality in a rural referral hospital in northern Tanzania: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ellen J T Nelissen; Estomih Mduma; Hege L Ersdal; Bjørg Evjen-Olsen; Jos J M van Roosmalen; Jelle Stekelenburg
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Quality metrics in solid organ transplantation: protocol for a systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Kendra E Brett; Alexandria Bennett; Nicholas Fergusson; Greg A Knoll
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2016-06-14

10.  Rate of spontaneous onset of labour before planned repeat caesarean section at term.

Authors:  Christine L Roberts; Michael C Nicholl; Charles S Algert; Jane B Ford; Jonathan M Morris; Jian Sheng Chen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.