Dorothea Mostello1, Jen Jen Chang, Judy Allen, Laura Luehr, Jaye Shyken, Terry Leet. 1. Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, and School of Public Health, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA. mostello@slu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether the risk of recurrent preeclampsia is affected by interpregnancy change in body mass index (BMI). METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using Missouri maternally linked birth certificates for 17,773 women whose first pregnancies were complicated by preeclampsia. The women were placed into three groups: those who decreased their BMIs, those who maintained their BMIs, and those who increased their BMIs between their first two pregnancies. The primary outcome was recurrent preeclampsia in the second pregnancy. Adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Poisson regression analysis. RESULTS: The overall rate of recurrent preeclampsia in women who decreased their BMIs between pregnancies was 12.8% (risk ratio 0.70, confidence interval 0.60-0.81) compared with 14.8% if BMI was maintained and 18.5% in those who increased their BMIs (risk ratio 1.29, confidence interval 1.20-1.38). Within the normal weight, overweight, and obese weight categories, women who decreased BMI between pregnancies were less likely to experience recurrent preeclampsia. Women in all weight categories who increased their BMIs between pregnancies were more likely to experience recurrent preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: Interpregnancy weight reduction decreases the risk of recurrent preeclampsia and should be encouraged in women who experience preeclampsia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether the risk of recurrent preeclampsia is affected by interpregnancy change in body mass index (BMI). METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study using Missouri maternally linked birth certificates for 17,773 women whose first pregnancies were complicated by preeclampsia. The women were placed into three groups: those who decreased their BMIs, those who maintained their BMIs, and those who increased their BMIs between their first two pregnancies. The primary outcome was recurrent preeclampsia in the second pregnancy. Adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using Poisson regression analysis. RESULTS: The overall rate of recurrent preeclampsia in women who decreased their BMIs between pregnancies was 12.8% (risk ratio 0.70, confidence interval 0.60-0.81) compared with 14.8% if BMI was maintained and 18.5% in those who increased their BMIs (risk ratio 1.29, confidence interval 1.20-1.38). Within the normal weight, overweight, and obese weight categories, women who decreased BMI between pregnancies were less likely to experience recurrent preeclampsia. Women in all weight categories who increased their BMIs between pregnancies were more likely to experience recurrent preeclampsia. CONCLUSION: Interpregnancy weight reduction decreases the risk of recurrent preeclampsia and should be encouraged in women who experience preeclampsia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.
Authors: Chelsea Lynes; Alexander C McLain; Edwina H Yeung; Paul Albert; Jihong Liu; Nansi S Boghossian Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2017-09-21 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Nansi S Boghossian; Edwina Yeung; Pauline Mendola; Stefanie N Hinkle; S Katherine Laughon; Cuilin Zhang; Paul S Albert Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: April Rees; Oliver Richards; Megan Chambers; Benjamin J Jenkins; James G Cronin; Catherine A Thornton Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2022-06-11 Impact factor: 5.732
Authors: Elizabeth Stankiewicz Machado; Margot R Krauss; Karen Megazzini; Conrado Milani Coutinho; Regis Kreitchmann; Victor Hugo Melo; José Henrique Pilotto; Mariana Ceriotto; Cristina B Hofer; George K Siberry; D Heather Watts Journal: J Infect Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 6.072
Authors: Kyle R Roell; Quaker E Harmon; Kari Klungsøyr; Anna E Bauer; Per Magnus; Stephanie M Engel Journal: Hypertension Date: 2021-04-05 Impact factor: 9.897
Authors: Elisabet Forsum; Anne Lise Brantsæter; Anna-Sigrid Olafsdottir; Sjurdur F Olsen; Inga Thorsdottir Journal: Food Nutr Res Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 3.894