Literature DB >> 20733279

A nomogram to assess small-intestinal neuroendocrine tumor ('carcinoid') survival.

Irvin M Modlin1, Bjorn I Gustafsson, Marianne Pavel, Bernhard Svejda, Benjamin Lawrence, Mark Kidd.   

Abstract

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of cancers of which the commonest site is the small intestine (SI). Most information available to determine tumor behavior reflects univariate assessment of factors or is anecdotal or experience based. There currently exists no objective multivariate analysis of indices that defines SI NET prognosis. A key unmet need is the lack of a rigorous mathematical-based tool - a nomogram - for the assessment of parameters that define progress, determine prognosis and can guide therapy. Since prediction of NET behavior is a critical criterion in determining clinical strategy, we constructed a NET nomogram (Modlin Score) for prognosis prediction, patient group comparisons and a guide for stratification of treatment and surveillance. We used hazard ratio (HR), Cox analysis and Kaplan-Meier analysis of published data and the current Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (approx. 20,000 patients) to develop a nomogram from 15 variables demonstrated to provide significant multivariate HRs. These included age, gender, ethnicity, symptoms, urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid, plasma chromogranin A, liver function tests, tumor size, invasion, metastasis, histology, Ki-67 index, carcinoid heart disease and therapy (surgery or long-acting somatostatin analogs). Internal validation was assessed using 33 SI NET patients. A NET nomoscore (Modlin Score) was developed by HR weighting and stratification into low (<75), medium (75-95) and high risk (>95). This identified significant differences (p <0.03, Kaplan-Meier) in survival (15.5 ± 4.3, 9.7 ± 2.5 and 6.4 ± 1.1 years, respectively). The Modlin Score was significantly elevated (p <0.01) in deceased compared to alive patients. This nomogram represents an optimized construct based upon currently analyzable data, and application will facilitate accurate stratification for comparison in clinical trials. External validation and amplification by identification of additional indices, e.g. molecular biomarkers, are necessary. The development of a mathematically validated nomogram provides a platform for objective assessment of SI NET disease, a finite basis for precise prognostication and a tool to guide management strategy.
Copyright © 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20733279     DOI: 10.1159/000319784

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroendocrinology        ISSN: 0028-3835            Impact factor:   4.914


  32 in total

1.  Survival impact of malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine and islet cell neoplasm phenotypes.

Authors:  Christina L Roland; Aihua Bian; John C Mansour; Adam C Yopp; Glen C Balch; Rohit Sharma; Xian-Jin Xie; Roderich E Schwarz
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.454

Review 2.  Echocardiography in functional midgut neuroendocrine tumors: When and how often.

Authors:  Javier G Castillo; Tara Naib; Jerome S Zacks; David H Adams
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 6.514

Review 3.  Ki67 labeling index: assessment and prognostic role in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  Günter Klöppel; Stefano La Rosa
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 4.064

4.  The future of nuclear medicine imaging of neuroendocrine tumors: on a clear day one might see forever....

Authors:  Lisa Bodei; Mark Kidd; Vikas Prasad; Richard P Baum; Ignat Drozdov; Irvin M Modlin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Gene transcript analysis blood values correlate with ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-somatostatin analog (SSA) PET/CT imaging in neuroendocrine tumors and can define disease status.

Authors:  L Bodei; M Kidd; I M Modlin; V Prasad; S Severi; V Ambrosini; D J Kwekkeboom; E P Krenning; R P Baum; G Paganelli; I Drozdov
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Outcome of surgery for ileojejunal neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  Nils Habbe; Volker Fendrich; Anna Heverhagen; Annette Ramaswamy; Detlef K Bartsch
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Sequence of therapy and survival in patients with advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours.

Authors:  E S Tsang; J M Loree; C Speers; H F Kennecke
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Nomogram predicting the risk of recurrence after curative-intent resection of primary non-metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: An analysis of the U.S. Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group.

Authors:  Katiuscha Merath; Fabio Bagante; Eliza W Beal; Alexandra G Lopez-Aguiar; George Poultsides; Eleftherios Makris; Flavio Rocha; Zaheer Kanji; Sharon Weber; Alexander Fisher; Ryan Fields; Bradley A Krasnick; Kamran Idrees; Paula M Smith; Cliff Cho; Megan Beems; Carl R Schmidt; Mary Dillhoff; Shishir K Maithel; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Measurement of circulating transcripts and gene cluster analysis predicts and defines therapeutic efficacy of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in neuroendocrine tumors.

Authors:  L Bodei; M Kidd; I M Modlin; S Severi; I Drozdov; S Nicolini; D J Kwekkeboom; E P Krenning; R P Baum; G Paganelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Small bowel carcinoid: Location isn't everything!

Authors:  Danielle M Hari; Stephanie L Goff; Heidi J Reich; Anna M Leung; Myung-Shin Sim; Ji Hey Lee; Edward Wolin; Farin Amersi
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-08-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.