PURPOSE:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression has been consistently found to be an independent predictor of local-regional relapse (LRR) after radiotherapy. We assessed the extent by which it can refine risk classification for overall survival (OS) and LRR in patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: EGFR expression in locally advanced HNSCC was measured by immunohistochemistry in a series of patients randomized to receive accelerated or conventional radiation regimens in a Phase III trial. Subsequently, data of the two series were pooled (N = 533) for conducting a recursive partitioning analysis that incorporated clinical parameters (e.g., performance status, primary site, T and N categories) and four molecular markers (EGFR, p53, Ki-67, and microvessel density). RESULTS: This study confirmed that patients with higher than median levels of tumor EGFR expression had a lower OS (relative risk [RR]: 1.90, p = 0.0010) and a higher LRR (RR: 1.91, p = 0.0163). Of the four markers analyzed, only EGFR was found to contribute to refining classification of patients into three risk classes with distinct OS and LRR outcomes. The addition of EGFR to three clinical parameters could identify patients having up to a fivefold difference in the risk of LRR. CONCLUSIONS: Adding pretreatment EGFR expression data to known robust clinical prognostic variables improved the estimation of the probability for OS and LRR after radiotherapy. Its use for stratifying or selecting patients with defined tumor feature and pattern of relapse for enrollment into clinical trials testing specific therapeutic strategy warrants further investigation.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression has been consistently found to be an independent predictor of local-regional relapse (LRR) after radiotherapy. We assessed the extent by which it can refine risk classification for overall survival (OS) and LRR in patients with head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). METHODS AND MATERIALS: EGFR expression in locally advanced HNSCC was measured by immunohistochemistry in a series of patients randomized to receive accelerated or conventional radiation regimens in a Phase III trial. Subsequently, data of the two series were pooled (N = 533) for conducting a recursive partitioning analysis that incorporated clinical parameters (e.g., performance status, primary site, T and N categories) and four molecular markers (EGFR, p53, Ki-67, and microvessel density). RESULTS: This study confirmed that patients with higher than median levels of tumorEGFR expression had a lower OS (relative risk [RR]: 1.90, p = 0.0010) and a higher LRR (RR: 1.91, p = 0.0163). Of the four markers analyzed, only EGFR was found to contribute to refining classification of patients into three risk classes with distinct OS and LRR outcomes. The addition of EGFR to three clinical parameters could identify patients having up to a fivefold difference in the risk of LRR. CONCLUSIONS: Adding pretreatment EGFR expression data to known robust clinical prognostic variables improved the estimation of the probability for OS and LRR after radiotherapy. Its use for stratifying or selecting patients with defined tumor feature and pattern of relapse for enrollment into clinical trials testing specific therapeutic strategy warrants further investigation.
Authors: Jacques Bernier; Christian Domenge; Mahmut Ozsahin; Katarzyna Matuszewska; Jean-Louis Lefèbvre; Richard H Greiner; Jordi Giralt; Philippe Maingon; Frédéric Rolland; Michel Bolla; Francesco Cognetti; Jean Bourhis; Anne Kirkpatrick; Martine van Glabbeke Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-05-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: L J Peters; H Goepfert; K K Ang; R M Byers; M H Maor; O Guillamondegui; W H Morrison; R S Weber; A S Garden; R A Frankenthaler Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1993-04-30 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: J Rubin Grandis; M F Melhem; W E Gooding; R Day; V A Holst; M M Wagener; S D Drenning; D J Tweardy Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1998-06-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: K D Olsen; M Caruso; R L Foote; R J Stanley; J E Lewis; S J Buskirk; D A Frassica; L W DeSanto; W M O'Fallon; V R Hoverman Journal: Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 1994-12
Authors: M Maurizi; G Almadori; G Ferrandina; M Distefano; M E Romanini; G Cadoni; P Benedetti-Panici; G Paludetti; G Scambia; S Mancuso Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1996-10 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: K Kian Ang; Qiang Zhang; David I Rosenthal; Phuc Felix Nguyen-Tan; Eric J Sherman; Randal S Weber; James M Galvin; James A Bonner; Jonathan Harris; Adel K El-Naggar; Maura L Gillison; Richard C Jordan; Andre A Konski; Wade L Thorstad; Andy Trotti; Jonathan J Beitler; Adam S Garden; William J Spanos; Sue S Yom; Rita S Axelrod Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-09-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Alexandre A B A da Costa; Felipe D'Almeida Costa; Adriana R Ribeiro; Andréia P Guimarães; Ludmila T Chinen; Clóvis A P Lopes; Vladmir C C de Lima Journal: Int J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-05-27 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Christine H Chung; James J Dignam; M Elizabeth Hammond; Alexander C Klimowicz; Stephanie K Petrillo; Anthony Magliocco; Richard Jordan; Andy Trotti; Sharon Spencer; Jay S Cooper; Quynh-Thu Le; K Kian Ang Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-02-28 Impact factor: 44.544