Literature DB >> 20732607

Quality of chest compressions during continuous CPR; comparison between chest compression-only CPR and conventional CPR.

Chika Nishiyama1, Taku Iwami, Takashi Kawamura, Masahiko Ando, Naohiro Yonemoto, Atsushi Hiraide, Hiroshi Nonogi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the time-dependent deterioration of chest compressions between chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and conventional CPR.
METHODS: This study involved 106 and 107 participants randomly assigned to chest compression-only CPR training and conventional CPR training, respectively. Immediately after training, participants were asked to perform CPR for 2 min and the quality of their CPR skills were evaluated. The number of chest compressions in total and those with appropriate depth were counted every 20-s CPR period from the start of CPR. The primary outcome was the CPR quality index calculated as the proportion of chest compressions with appropriate depth among total chest compressions.
RESULTS: The total number of chest compressions remained stable over time both in the chest compression-only and the conventional CPR groups. The CPR quality index, however, decreased from 86.6+/-25.0 to 58.2+/-36.9 in the chest compression-only CPR group from 0-20 s through 61-80 s. The reduction was greater than in the conventional CPR group (85.9+/-25.5 to 74.3+/-34.0). The difference in the CPR quality index reached statistical significance (p=0.003) at 61-80 s period.
CONCLUSIONS: Chest compressions with appropriate depth decreased more rapidly during chest compression-only CPR than conventional CPR. We recommend that CPR providers change their roles every 1 min to maintain the quality of chest compressions during chest compression-only CPR. (UMIN-CTR C0000000321). Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20732607     DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Resuscitation        ISSN: 0300-9572            Impact factor:   5.262


  18 in total

1.  Performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during prolonged basic life support in military medical university students: A manikin study.

Authors:  Juan Wang; Chao-Nan Zhuo; Lei Zhang; Yu-Shun Gong; Chang-Lin Yin; Yong-Qin Li
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2015

2.  Does the use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation feedback devices improve the quality of chest compressions performed by doctors? A prospective, randomized, cross-over simulation study.

Authors:  Jolanta Majer; Milosz J Jaguszewski; Michael Frass; Marcin Leskiewicz; Jacek Smereka; Jerzy R Ładny; Oliver Robak; Łukasz Szarpak
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.737

3.  Efficacy of acute care health care providers in cardiopulmonary resuscitation compressions in normal and obese adult simulation manikins.

Authors:  Alaina Tellson; Huanying Qin; Kristin Erwin; Susan Houston
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2017-10

4.  Bystander-initiated chest compression-only CPR is better than standard CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Authors:  L Cabrini; G Biondi-Zoccai; G Landoni; M Greco; F Vinciguerra; T Greco; L Ruggeri; J Sayeg; A Zangrillo
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2010

5.  Current status of establishing a venous line in CPA patients by Emergency Life-Saving Technicians in the prehospital setting in Japan and a proposal for intraosseous infusion.

Authors:  Kenji Isayama; Toshio Nakatani; Masanobu Tsuda; Akihiko Hirakawa
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-01-09

6.  Quality of continuous chest compressions performed for one or two minutes.

Authors:  Renan Gianotto-Oliveira; Gustavo Gianotto-Oliveira; Maria Margarita Gonzalez; Ana Paula Quilici; Felipe Passos Andrade; Caio Brito Vianna; Sergio Timerman
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.365

7.  Degree of exercise intensity during continuous chest compression in upper-body-trained individuals.

Authors:  Hisayoshi Ogata; Ikuyo Fujimaru; Takaharu Kondo
Journal:  J Physiol Anthropol       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 2.867

8.  Protocol of a Multicenter International Randomized Controlled Manikin Study on Different Protocols of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for laypeople (MANI-CPR).

Authors:  Enrico Baldi; Enrico Contri; Roman Burkart; Paola Borrelli; Ottavia Eleonora Ferraro; Michela Tonani; Amedeo Cutuli; Daniele Bertaia; Pasquale Iozzo; Caroline Tinguely; Daniel Lopez; Susi Boldarin; Claudio Deiuri; Sandrine Dénéréaz; Yves Dénéréaz; Michael Terrapon; Christian Tami; Cinzia Cereda; Alberto Somaschini; Stefano Cornara; Andrea Cortegiani
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-19       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  Interventions to improve the quality of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A systematic review.

Authors:  Kuan-Yu Chen; Ying-Chih Ko; Ming-Ju Hsieh; Wen-Chu Chiang; Matthew Huei-Ming Ma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Are two or four hands needed for elderly female bystanders to achieve the required chest compression depth during dispatcher-assisted CPR: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Asta Krikscionaitiene; Zilvinas Dambrauskas; Tracey Barron; Egle Vaitkaitiene; Dinas Vaitkaitis
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2016-04-11       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.