Literature DB >> 20732527

Kryptonite bone cement prevents pathologic sternal displacement.

Paul W M Fedak1, Eric Kolb, Garry Borsato, Dean E C Frohlich, Aleksey Kasatkin, Kishan Narine, Naresh Akkarapaka, Kathryn M King.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wire cerclage closure of sternotomy is the standard of care despite evidence of pathologic sternal displacement (> 2 mm) during physiologic distracting forces (coughing). Postoperative functional recovery, respiration, pain, sternal dehiscence, and infection are influenced by early bone stability. This translational research report provides proof-of-concept (part A) and first-in-man clinical data (part B) with use of a triglyceride-based porous adhesive to rapidly enhance the stability of conventional sternal closure.
METHODS: In part A, fresh human cadaver blocks were subjected to midline sternotomy and either conventional wire closure or modified adhesive closure. After 24 hours at 37 degrees C, using a biomechanical test apparatus, a step-wise increase in lateral distracting force simulated physiologic stress. Sternal displacement was measured by microdisplacement sensors. In part B, a selected clinical case series was performed and sternal perfusion assessed by serial single photon emission computed tomography imaging.
RESULTS: Wire closure resulted in measurable bony displacement with increasing load. Pathologic displacement (> or = 2 mm) was observed in all regional segments at loads 400 newton (N) or greater. In contrast, adhesive closure completely eliminated pathologic displacement at forces 600 N or less (p < 0.001). In patients, adhesive closure was not associated with adverse events such as adhesive migration, embolization, or infection. There was excellent qualitative correlation between cadaver and clinical computed tomographic images. Sternal perfusion was not compromised by adhesive closure.
CONCLUSIONS: This first-in-man series provides proof-of-concept indicating that a novel biologic bone adhesive is capable of rapid sternal fixation and complete elimination of pathologic sternal displacement under physiologic loading conditions. A randomized clinical trial is warranted to further define the potential risks and benefits of this innovative technique. 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20732527     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  12 in total

Review 1.  Sternal wound closure in the current era: the need of a tailored approach.

Authors:  Antonio Nenna; Francesco Nappi; Jennifer Dougal; Umberto Satriano; Camilla Chello; Ciro Mastroianni; Mario Lusini; Massimo Chello; Cristiano Spadaccio
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2019-09-17

Review 2.  Review of Biomechanical Studies and Finite Element Modeling of Sternal Closure Using Bio-Active Adhesives.

Authors:  Amatulraheem Al-Abassi; Marcello Papini; Mark Towler
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-03

3.  A Novel Glass Polyalkenoate Cement for Fixation and Stabilisation of the Ribcage, Post Sternotomy Surgery: An ex-Vivo Study.

Authors:  Adel M F Alhalawani; Declan J Curran; Belinda Pingguan-Murphy; Daniel Boyd; Mark R Towler
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2013-11-21

4.  Effect of sternal closure with biological bone adhesive on pain visual analogue score and serum cytokine.

Authors:  Shahrul Hashim; Leow Yeen Chin; Sivakumar Krishnasamy; Pavai Sthaneswar; Raja Amin Raja Mokhtar
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  The Sternal Management Accelerated Recovery Trial (S.M.A.R.T) - standard restrictive versus an intervention of modified sternal precautions following cardiac surgery via median sternotomy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Md Ali Katijjahbe; Linda Denehy; Catherine L Granger; Alistair Royse; Colin Royse; Rebecca Bates; Sarah Logie; Sandy Clarke; Doa El-Ansary
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Adhesive-Enhanced Sternal Closure: Feasibility and Safety of Late Sternal Reentry.

Authors:  Aaron J Spooner; Holly E M Mewhort; Lisa M DiFrancesco; Paul W M Fedak
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2017-05-29

7.  Measurement of Adhesion of Sternal Wires to a Novel Bioactive Glass-Based Adhesive.

Authors:  Varinder Pal Singh Sidhu; Mark R Towler; Marcello Papini
Journal:  J Funct Biomater       Date:  2019-08-09

Review 8.  Current State of Bone Adhesives-Necessities and Hurdles.

Authors:  Kai O Böker; Katharina Richter; Katharina Jäckle; Shahed Taheri; Ingo Grunwald; Kai Borcherding; Janek von Byern; Andreas Hartwig; Britt Wildemann; Arndt F Schilling; Wolfgang Lehmann
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-30       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Bone cement-enhanced sternal closure technique in cardiac surgery: effects on sternal union, pain and life quality.

Authors:  Zehra Bayramoglu; Yasemen Durak; Muhammed Bayram; Onur Levent Ulusoy; Barıs Caynak; Ertan Sagbas; Belhan Akpınar
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 1.637

10.  The sealing ability of novel Kryptonite adhesive bone cement as a retrograde filling material.

Authors:  İsmail Uzun; Cangül Keskin; Buğra Güler
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2016-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.