Antonio Nenna1, Francesco Nappi2, Jennifer Dougal3, Umberto Satriano4, Camilla Chello5, Ciro Mastroianni4, Mario Lusini4, Massimo Chello4, Cristiano Spadaccio3. 1. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy. a.nenna@unicampus.it. 2. Cardiac Surgery, Centre Cardiologique du Nord de Saint-Denis, Paris, France. 3. Cardiac Surgery, Golden Jubilee National Hospital, Glasgow, UK. 4. Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico Di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo 200, 00128, Rome, Italy. 5. Dermatology, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Rome, Italy.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Median sternotomy remains the most common access to perform cardiac surgery procedures. However, the experience of the operating surgeon remains a crucial factor during sternal closure to avoid potential complications related to poor sternal healing, such as mediastinitis. Considering the lack of major randomized controlled trials and the heterogeneity of the current literature, this narrative review aims to summarize the different techniques and approaches to sternal closure with the aim to investigate their reflections into clinical outcomes and to inform the choice on the most effective closure method after median sternotomy. METHODS: A literature search through PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, Cochrane database of systematic reviews, and Web of Science from its inception up to April 2019 using the following search keywords in various combinations: sternal, sternotomy, mediastinitis, deep sternal wound infection, cardiac surgery, closure. RESULTS: Single wire fixation methods, at present, seems the most useful method to perform sternal closure in routine patients, although patients with a fragile sternum might benefit more from a figure-of-eight technique. In high-risk patients (e.g. chronic pulmonary disease, obesity, bilateral internal mammary artery harvesting, diabetes, off-midline sternotomy), rigid plate fixation is currently the most effective method, if available; alternatively, weave techniques could be used. CONCLUSION: The choice among the sternal closure techniques should be mainly inspired and tailored on the patient's characteristics, and correct judgement and experience play a pivotal role. A decisional algorithm has been proposed as an attempt to overcome the absence of specific guidelines and to guide the operative approach. This operative approach might be used also in non-cardiac procedure in which median sternotomy is required, such as in case of thoracic surgery.
OBJECTIVE: Median sternotomy remains the most common access to perform cardiac surgery procedures. However, the experience of the operating surgeon remains a crucial factor during sternal closure to avoid potential complications related to poor sternal healing, such as mediastinitis. Considering the lack of major randomized controlled trials and the heterogeneity of the current literature, this narrative review aims to summarize the different techniques and approaches to sternal closure with the aim to investigate their reflections into clinical outcomes and to inform the choice on the most effective closure method after median sternotomy. METHODS: A literature search through PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, Cochrane database of systematic reviews, and Web of Science from its inception up to April 2019 using the following search keywords in various combinations: sternal, sternotomy, mediastinitis, deep sternal wound infection, cardiac surgery, closure. RESULTS: Single wire fixation methods, at present, seems the most useful method to perform sternal closure in routine patients, although patients with a fragile sternum might benefit more from a figure-of-eight technique. In high-risk patients (e.g. chronic pulmonary disease, obesity, bilateral internal mammary artery harvesting, diabetes, off-midline sternotomy), rigid plate fixation is currently the most effective method, if available; alternatively, weave techniques could be used. CONCLUSION: The choice among the sternal closure techniques should be mainly inspired and tailored on the patient's characteristics, and correct judgement and experience play a pivotal role. A decisional algorithm has been proposed as an attempt to overcome the absence of specific guidelines and to guide the operative approach. This operative approach might be used also in non-cardiac procedure in which median sternotomy is required, such as in case of thoracic surgery.
Authors: Alberto Rainer; Cristiano Spadaccio; Pietro Sedati; Federico De Marco; Simone Carotti; Mario Lusini; Gianluca Vadalà; Alberto Di Martino; Sergio Morini; Massimo Chello; Elvio Covino; Vincenzo Denaro; Marcella Trombetta Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: Thomas A Schwann; Robert H Habib; Amelia Wallace; David M Shahian; Sean O'Brien; Jeffery P Jacobs; John D Puskas; Paul A Kurlansky; Milo C Engoren; Robert F Tranbaugh; Mark R Bonnell Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2018-02-14 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Benedikt J Braun; Steven C Herath; Mika F R Rollmann; Maximilian M Menger; Heiko Baumgartner; Marie Reumann; Tina Histing Journal: Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb) Date: 2022-02-08