Literature DB >> 20732481

Use of the AB5000 ventricular assist device in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction.

Mark Anderson1, Nicholas Smedira, Louis Samuels, Michael Madani, Yoshifumi Naka, Michael Acker, Mariah Hout, Karim Benali.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The mortality rate of patients experiencing acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock remains high. After conventional therapies have failed, ventricular assist devices (VADs) have been used to bridge patients to recovery or transplantation.
METHODS: A voluntary US registry was established to track all patients implanted with the AB5000 VAD. We report the results of the first 100 patients in the registry with the indication of AMI cardiogenic shock. Data were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, preimplant condition, surgical techniques, and outcomes. Survival was assessed at 30 days after VAD explant or at discharge. Myocardial recovery (subset of survival) was defined as satisfactory unassisted native cardiac function for 30 days after VAD explant or at discharge.
RESULTS: Forty patients (40%) survived to 30 days after VAD explant or discharge of the first 100 patients. Of the survivors, 63% (n = 25) experienced myocardial recovery. Patients who recovered required an average of 25 +/- 22 days of VAD support. The estimated survival after explant for the recovery patients at 2 years after VAD explant was 78%.
CONCLUSIONS: Results from this nationwide registry suggest that VADs can restore normal hemodynamics and support recovery of native cardiac function in the majority of survivors when conventional therapies fail. However, a longer duration of support than previously recognized may be required. In the absence of clinical guidelines, early aggressive use of VAD support in AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock may improve outcomes, and recovery of native cardiac function should always be the primary goal. 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20732481     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current status of extracorporeal ventricular assist devices in Japan.

Authors:  Takashi Nishimura
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Bridge-to-decision therapy with a continuous-flow external ventricular assist device in refractory cardiogenic shock of various causes.

Authors:  Hiroo Takayama; Lori Soni; Bindu Kalesan; Lauren K Truby; Takeyoshi Ota; Sophia Cedola; Zain Khalpey; Nir Uriel; Paolo Colombo; Donna M Mancini; Ulrich P Jorde; Yoshifumi Naka
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 8.790

3.  Survey of blood pump diaphragm damage in the NIPRO-ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Koichi Kashiwa; Takashi Nishimura; Aoi Nakahata; Naoki Momose; Chinori Umeda; Hitoshi Kubo; Hisayoshi Tamai; Koichiro Kinugawa; Hideo Adachi; Atsushi Yamaguchi; Tomoyuki Yambe; Toshiyuki Katohgi; Shunei Kyo; Minoru Ono
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-08-25       Impact factor: 1.731

4.  Preliminary in vivo testing of a novel pump for short-term extracorporeal life support.

Authors:  David J Spurlock; Kelly Koch; Daniel E Mazur; Emilia M Fracz; Robert H Bartlett; Jonathan W Haft
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 5.  Cardiogenic shock in ACS. Part 2: Role of mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Stephen Westaby; Kyriakos Anastasiadis; George M Wieselthaler
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Inappropriate restrictions on life saving technology.

Authors:  Stephen Westaby; David Taggart
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 5.994

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.