Literature DB >> 2073096

Ciprofloxacin-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in an acute-care hospital.

M C Raviglione1, J F Boyle, P Mariuz, A Pablos-Mendez, H Cortes, A Merlo.   

Abstract

Use of ciprofloxacin as an alternative to vancomycin for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection has been paralleled by the emergence of resistant strains. This phenomenon has also been noticed in our hospital. To confirm our observation, methicillin and ciprofloxacin susceptibilities were tested by disk diffusion and broth microdilution techniques. We studied 83 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates obtained from various sources over a 4-month period. Ciprofloxacin resistance (MIC, greater than 2 micrograms/ml) was detected in 69 isolates (83%). Prior use of ciprofloxacin was reported for 24 of 69 patients with ciprofloxacin-resistant strains and 0 of 14 patients with ciprofloxacin-susceptible strains. The day of detection during the hospital stay and the location of the source patient were not significantly different between resistant and susceptible strains. Bacteriophage typing showed a higher occurrence of nontypeable strains among ciprofloxacin-resistant strains (54%). Review of our microbiology register showed a progressive increase in the rate of resistance to ciprofloxacin during the first year of use, with initial rates being about 10% and recent rates being higher than 80%. On the other hand, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus remained uniformly susceptible to ciprofloxacin (98.4%). We conclude that prior use of ciprofloxacin is an important factor for the selection of ciprofloxacin-resistant strains and that ciprofloxacin has limited usefulness against methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2073096      PMCID: PMC171997          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.34.11.2050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  27 in total

1.  Simplified scheme for routine identification of human Staphylococcus species.

Authors:  W E Kloos; K H Schleifer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  The in-vitro activity of some antimicrobial agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  E C Moorhouse; T E Mulvihill; L Jones; D Mooney; F R Falkiner; C T Keane
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Bactericidal activity of ciprofloxacin against amikacin- and cefotaxime-resistant gram-negative bacilli and methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  M S Simberkoff; J J Rahal
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Performance of the prompt system in identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates.

Authors:  B Flejzor; V D Bokkenheuser
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Staphylococcal sepsis. The changing pattern of disease and therapy.

Authors:  S J Eykyn
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1988-01-16       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains in New York City hospitals: inter-hospital spread of resistant strains of type 88.

Authors:  S Schaefler; D Jones; W Perry; T Baradet; E Mayr; C Rampersad
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  High Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage rate in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or AIDS-related complex.

Authors:  M C Raviglione; P Mariuz; A Pablos-Mendez; R Battan; P Ottuso; A Taranta
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 2.918

8.  Ciprofloxacin for eradication of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization.

Authors:  M E Mulligan; P J Ruane; L Johnston; P Wong; J P Wheelock; K MacDonald; J F Reinhardt; C C Johnson; B Statner; I Blomquist
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1987-04-27       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Activity of ciprofloxacin against resistant clinical isolates.

Authors:  S G Kelley; M A Bertram; L S Young
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Ciprofloxacin versus vancomycin in the therapy of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.

Authors:  G W Kaatz; S L Barriere; D R Schaberg; R Fekety
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  35 in total

1.  Antibacterial spectrum of a novel des-fluoro(6) quinolone, BMS-284756.

Authors:  J C Fung-Tomc; B Minassian; B Kolek; E Huczko; L Aleksunes; T Stickle; T Washo; E Gradelski; L Valera; D P Bonner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vitro antibiotic resistance in bacterial keratitis in London.

Authors:  S J Tuft; M Matheson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Spontaneously occurring staphylococcal mutants resistant to clinically achievable concentrations of ciprofloxacin and temafloxacin.

Authors:  A L Barry; M A Pfaller; P C Fuchs
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Antistaphylococcal activity of the fluoroquinolones CI-960, PD 131628, sparfloxacin, ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin.

Authors:  A L Barry; P C Fuchs
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Activity of new quinolones against ciprofloxacin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  G J Forstall; C C Knapp; J A Washington
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  In vitro and in vivo evaluations of LB20304, a new fluoronaphthyridone.

Authors:  J I Oh; K S Paek; M J Ahn; M Y Kim; C Y Hong; I C Kim; J H Kwak
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  The epidemiology of bacterial resistance to quinolones.

Authors:  J F Acar; T F O'Brien; F W Goldstein; R N Jones
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  A prospective, randomized study of pefloxacin versus teicoplanin in the treatment of gram-positive coccal infections in cancer patients: early termination due to emergence of resistance to fluoroquinolones.

Authors:  M Aoun; P Van der Auwera; I Varthalitis; A M Bourguignon; M Janssen; D Daneau; F Meunier
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  Ciprofloxacin. A review of its pharmacological profile and therapeutic use in the elderly.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; J A Balfour
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  Ciprofloxacin-induced, low-level resistance to structurally unrelated antibiotics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J Fung-Tomc; B Kolek; D P Bonner
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.