Literature DB >> 20730004

Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language.

L Noyez1, P C Kievit, M W A Verkroost, H B van Wetten, A F T M Verhagen, H A van Swieten.   

Abstract

Over the last years, measurements of quality of care have become more and more a public product, used by providers, purchasers and consumers, and patients. This information serves as an important guide for improvement, as well as a decision support tool for everybody taking part in medical treatment. This evolution can be compared with advertising and as in commercials it is important to use the right information. In this report we focus on the quality of adult cardiac surgery. Honest information is of course essential, but in this article attention is asked for the variables used to evaluate the quality of cardiac surgery. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:365-9.).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Myocardial Revascularization; Quality of Health Care

Year:  2010        PMID: 20730004      PMCID: PMC2922783          DOI: 10.1007/BF03091793

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neth Heart J        ISSN: 1568-5888            Impact factor:   2.380


  11 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association clinical practice guidelines: Part I: where do they come from?

Authors:  Raymond J Gibbons; Sidney Smith; Elliott Antman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes?

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Justin B Dimick; Nancy J O Birkmeyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  The identification and development of Canadian coronary artery bypass graft surgery quality indicators.

Authors:  Veena Guru; Geoffrey M Anderson; Stephen E Fremes; Gerald T O'Connor; Frederick L Grover; Jack V Tu
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 5.  Cardiac surgery risk models: a position article.

Authors:  David M Shahian; Eugene H Blackstone; Fred H Edwards; Frederick L Grover; Gary L Grunkemeier; David C Naftel; Samer A M Nashef; William C Nugent; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association methodology for the selection and creation of performance measures for quantifying the quality of cardiovascular care.

Authors:  John A Spertus; Kim A Eagle; Harlan M Krumholz; Kristi R Mitchell; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  The importance of an organized follow-up for the evaluation of mortality after hospital discharge in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Luc Noyez; Freek W A Verheugt; Henry A van Swieten
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2008-02-13

Review 8.  Control charts, Cusum techniques and funnel plots. A review of methods for monitoring performance in healthcare.

Authors:  Luc Noyez
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-06-09

9.  Is no news good news? Organized follow-up, an absolute necessity for the evaluation of myocardial revascularization.

Authors:  Constantijn W Wouters; Luc Noyez
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  A hospital-randomized controlled trial of an educational quality improvement intervention in rural and small community hospitals in Texas following implementation of information technology.

Authors:  Giovanni Filardo; David Nicewander; Cody Hamilton; Jeph Herrin; Percy Galimbretti; Mari Tietze; Susan McBride; Julie Gunderson; Ziad Haydar; Josie Williams; David J Ballard
Journal:  Am J Med Qual       Date:  2007 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.852

View more
  1 in total

1.  Cardiac operative risk evaluation: The EuroSCORE II, does it make a real difference?

Authors:  L Noyez; P C Kievit; H A van Swieten; M-J de Boer
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.380

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.