Literature DB >> 15511504

Cardiac surgery risk models: a position article.

David M Shahian1, Eugene H Blackstone, Fred H Edwards, Frederick L Grover, Gary L Grunkemeier, David C Naftel, Samer A M Nashef, William C Nugent, Eric D Peterson.   

Abstract

Differences in medical outcomes may result from disease severity, treatment effectiveness, or chance. Because most outcome studies are observational rather than randomized, risk adjustment is necessary to account for case mix. This has usually been accomplished through the use of standard logistic regression models, although Bayesian models, hierarchical linear models, and machine-learning techniques such as neural networks have also been used. Many factors are essential to insuring the accuracy and usefulness of such models, including selection of an appropriate clinical database, inclusion of critical core variables, precise definitions for predictor variables and endpoints, proper model development, validation, and audit. Risk models may be used to assess the impact of specific predictors on outcome, to aid in patient counseling and treatment selection, to profile provider quality, and to serve as the basis of continuous quality improvement activities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15511504     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.05.054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  21 in total

1.  Initial application in the EACTS and STS Congenital Heart Surgery Databases of an empirically derived methodology of complexity adjustment to evaluate surgical case mix and results.

Authors:  Jeffrey Phillip Jacobs; Marshall Lewis Jacobs; Bohdan Maruszewski; Francois G Lacour-Gayet; Christo I Tchervenkov; Zdzislaw Tobota; Giovanni Stellin; Hiromi Kurosawa; Arata Murakami; J William Gaynor; Sara K Pasquali; David R Clarke; Erle H Austin; Constantine Mavroudis
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Evaluation of quality in adult cardiac surgery: let us speak the same language.

Authors:  L Noyez; P C Kievit; M W A Verkroost; H B van Wetten; A F T M Verhagen; H A van Swieten
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.380

3.  The impact of physician-owned specialty orthopaedic hospitals on surgical volume and case complexity in competing hospitals.

Authors:  Xin Lu; Tyson P Hagen; Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin; Peter Cram
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Developing a genetic fuzzy system for risk assessment of mortality after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Mahyar Taghizadeh Nouei; Ali Vahidian Kamyad; MahmoodReza Sarzaeem; Somayeh Ghazalbash
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 5.  A review of factors predicting perioperative death and early outcome in hepatopancreaticobiliary cancer surgery.

Authors:  Chris D Mann; Tom Palser; Chris D Briggs; Iain Cameron; Myrrdin Rees; John Buckles; David P Berry
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.647

6.  Development of machine learning models for mortality risk prediction after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Yunlong Fan; Junfeng Dong; Yuanbin Wu; Ming Shen; Siming Zhu; Xiaoyi He; Shengli Jiang; Jiakang Shao; Chao Song
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-02

7.  Enhancing the Value of Population-Based Risk Scores for Institutional-Level Use.

Authors:  Sajjad Raza; Joseph F Sabik; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Jay J Idrees; Matteo Trezzi; Haris Riaz; Hoda Javadikasgari; Edward R Nowicki; Lars G Svensson; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Artificial neural networks versus multiple logistic regression to predict 30-day mortality after operations for type a ascending aortic dissection.

Authors:  Francesco Macrina; Paolo Emilio Puddu; Alfonso Sciangula; Fausto Trigilia; Marco Totaro; Fabio Miraldi; Francesca Toscano; Mauro Cassese; Michele Toscano
Journal:  Open Cardiovasc Med J       Date:  2009-07-07

Review 9.  Risk assessment methods for cardiac surgery and intervention.

Authors:  Nassir M Thalji; Rakesh M Suri; Kevin L Greason; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 32.419

10.  Long-term mortality prediction after operations for type A ascending aortic dissection.

Authors:  Francesco Macrina; Paolo E Puddu; Alfonso Sciangula; Marco Totaro; Fausto Trigilia; Mauro Cassese; Michele Toscano
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.