Literature DB >> 20729445

Diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis with diffusion-weighted imaging: value of normalized apparent diffusion coefficient using the spleen as reference organ.

Richard K G Do1, Hersh Chandarana, Hersh Chandanara, Ely Felker, Cristina H Hajdu, James S Babb, Danny Kim, Bachir Taouli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of liver apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) versus normalized liver ADC using the spleen as a reference organ for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients, 34 with liver disease and 22 control subjects, were assessed with breath-hold single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging using b values of 0, 50, and 500 s/mm(2). Liver ADC and normalized liver ADC (defined as the ratio of liver ADC to spleen ADC) were compared between patients stratified by fibrosis stage. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the performance of ADC and normalized liver ADC for prediction of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Reproducibility was assessed by measuring coefficient of variation (n = 7).
RESULTS: Liver ADC failed to distinguish individual stages of fibrosis, except between stages 0 and 4. There were significant differences in normalized liver ADC between control livers and intermediate stages of fibrosis (stages 2-3) and cirrhosis (stage 4) and between stages 1 and 4, and there was a trend toward significance between stages 0 and 1 (p = 0.051) and stages 1 and 3 (p = 0.06). ROC analysis showed that normalized liver ADC was superior to liver ADC for detection of stage > or = 2 (area under the ROC curve, 0.864 vs 0.655; p = 0.013) and stage > or =3 (0.805 vs 0.689; p = 0.015), without a difference for diagnosing cirrhosis (0.935 vs 0.720; p = 0.185). Normalized liver ADC had higher reproducibility than ADC (mean coefficient of variation, 3.5% vs 12.6%).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that normalizing liver ADC with spleen ADC improves diagnostic accuracy for detection of liver fibrosis and cirrhosis when using breath-hold diffusion-weighted imaging, with better reproducibility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20729445     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.09.3448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  40 in total

1.  Comparison of diffusion-weighted imaging and MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Weon Jang; Seongil Jo; Ji Soo Song; Hong Pil Hwang; Seong-Hun Kim
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-03-26

2.  Added value of apparent diffusion coefficient in distinguishing between serous and mucin-producing pancreatic cystic neoplasms.

Authors:  Pallavi Pandey; Ankur Pandey; Nannan Shao; Farnaz Najmi Varzaneh; Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh; Manijeh Zharghampour; Pegah Khoshpouri; Daniel Fouladi; John Eng; Anne Marie O'Broin-Lennon; Marcia Canto; Ralph H Hruban; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Apparent diffusion coefficient value of hepatic fibrosis and inflammation in children with chronic hepatitis.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel Khalek Abdel Razek; Mohamed Khashaba; Ahmed Abdalla; Mohamed Bayomy; Tarek Barakat
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Diffusion-weighted imaging of the head and neck in healthy subjects: reproducibility of ADC values in different MRI systems and repeat sessions.

Authors:  A S Kolff-Gart; P J W Pouwels; D P Noij; R Ljumanovic; V Vandecaveye; F de Keyzer; R de Bree; P de Graaf; D L Knol; J A Castelijns
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 5.  Diffusion-weighted MRI of the liver: challenges and some solutions for the quantification of apparent diffusion coefficient and intravoxel incoherent motion.

Authors:  Yi Xiang J Wang; Hua Huang; Cun-Jing Zheng; Ben-Heng Xiao; Olivier Chevallier; Wei Wang
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-04-15

6.  Accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour from intrapancreatic accessory spleen.

Authors:  Ankur Pandey; Pallavi Pandey; Mounes Aliyari Ghasabeh; Farnaz Najmi Varzaneh; Pegah Khoshpouri; Nannan Shao; Manijeh Zargham Pour; Daniel Fadaei Fouladi; Ralph H Hruban; Anne Marie O'Broin-Lennon; Ihab R Kamel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Can NASH be diagnosed, graded, and staged noninvasively?

Authors:  Garfield A Grandison; Paul Angulo
Journal:  Clin Liver Dis       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.126

8.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in intrahepatic bile duct adenoma arising from the cirrhotic liver.

Authors:  Chansik An; Sumi Park; Yoon Jung Choi
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  T2 relaxation time is related to liver fibrosis severity.

Authors:  Alexander R Guimaraes; Luiz Siqueira; Ritika Uppal; Jamu Alford; Bryan C Fuchs; Suguru Yamada; Kenneth Tanabe; Raymond T Chung; Gregory Lauwers; Michael L Chew; Giles W Boland; Duhyant V Sahani; Mark Vangel; Peter F Hahn; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2016-04

10.  Normal hepatic parenchyma visibility and ADC quantification on diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 T: influence of age, gender, and iron content.

Authors:  Thierry Metens; Kellen Fanstone Ferraresi; Alessandra Farchione; Christophe Moreno; Maria Antonietta Bali; Celso Matos
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.