OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to quantitatively evaluate the amount of dentin debris extruded from the apical foramen by comparing the conventional sequence of the ProTaper Universal nickel-titanium (NiTi) files with the single-file ProTaper F2 technique. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty mesial roots of lower molars were selected, and the use of different instrumentation techniques resulted in 3 groups (n=10 each). In G1, a crown-down hand-file technique was used, and in G2 conventional ProTaper Universal technique was used. In G3, ProTaper F2 file was used in a reciprocating motion. The apical finish preparation was equivalent to ISO size 25. An apparatus was used to evaluate the apically extruded debris. Statistical analysis was performed using 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparisons. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the amount of the debris extruded between the conventional sequence of the ProTaper Universal NiTi files and the single-file ProTaper F2 technique (P>.05). In contrast, the hand instrumentation group extruded significantly more debris than both NiTi groups (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The present results yielded favorable input for the F2 single-file technique in terms of apically extruded debris, inasmuch as it is the most simple and cost-effective instrumentation approach. Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to quantitatively evaluate the amount of dentin debris extruded from the apical foramen by comparing the conventional sequence of the ProTaper Universal nickel-titanium (NiTi) files with the single-file ProTaper F2 technique. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty mesial roots of lower molars were selected, and the use of different instrumentation techniques resulted in 3 groups (n=10 each). In G1, a crown-down hand-file technique was used, and in G2 conventional ProTaper Universal technique was used. In G3, ProTaper F2 file was used in a reciprocating motion. The apical finish preparation was equivalent to ISO size 25. An apparatus was used to evaluate the apically extruded debris. Statistical analysis was performed using 1-way analysis of variance and Tukey multiple comparisons. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in the amount of the debris extruded between the conventional sequence of the ProTaper Universal NiTi files and the single-file ProTaper F2 technique (P>.05). In contrast, the hand instrumentation group extruded significantly more debris than both NiTi groups (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: The present results yielded favorable input for the F2 single-file technique in terms of apically extruded debris, inasmuch as it is the most simple and cost-effective instrumentation approach. Copyright (c) 2010 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Authors: Mario Dioguardi; Giuseppe Troiano; Luigi Laino; Lucio Lo Russo; Giovanni Giannatempo; Floriana Lauritano; Marco Cicciù; Lorenzo Lo Muzio Journal: Int J Clin Exp Med Date: 2015-10-15
Authors: N Tulasi Priya; Veeramachaneni Chandrasekhar; S Anita; Muralidhar Tummala; T B Phanindhar Raj; Vijetha Badami; Pradeep Kumar; E Soujanya Journal: J Clin Diagn Res Date: 2014-12-05
Authors: Chiara Pirani; Oddone Ruggeri; Pier Paolo Cirulli; Gian Andrea Pelliccioni; Maria Giovanna Gandolfi; Carlo Prati Journal: Odontology Date: 2013-04-09 Impact factor: 2.634