Literature DB >> 20727062

Patient's decision making in selecting a hospital for elective orthopaedic surgery.

Albine Moser1, Irene Korstjens, Trudy van der Weijden, Huibert Tange.   

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: The admission to a hospital for elective surgery, like arthroplasty, can be planned ahead. The elective nature of arthroplasty and the increasing stimulus of the public to critically select a hospital raise the issue of how patients actually take such decisions. The aim of this paper is to describe the decision-making process of selecting a hospital as experienced by people who underwent elective joint arthroplasty and to understand what factors influenced the decision-making process.
METHODS: Qualitative descriptive study with 18 participants who had a hip or knee replacement within the last 5 years. Data were gathered from eight individual interviews and four focus group interviews and analysed by content analysis.
RESULTS: Three categories that influenced the selection of a hospital were revealed: information sources, criteria in decision making and decision-making styles within the GP- patient relationship. Various contextual aspects influenced the decision-making process. Most participants gave higher priority to the selection of a medical specialist than to the selection of a hospital.
CONCLUSION: Selecting a hospital for arthroplasty is extremely complex. The decision-making process is a highly individualized process because patients have to consider and assimilate a diversity of aspects, which are relevant to their specific situation. Our findings support the model of shared decision making, which indicates that general practitioners should be attuned to the distinct needs of each patient at various moments during the decision making, taking into account personal, medical and contextual factors.
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20727062     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01311.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract        ISSN: 1356-1294            Impact factor:   2.431


  9 in total

1.  Patients' and clinicians' views of comparing the performance of providers of surgery: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Zoe Hildon; Dominique Allwood; Nick Black
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  What factors are important to new patients when selecting an orthopedic oncologist?

Authors:  Charles A Gusho; Vishal Patel; Linus Lee; Alan T Blank
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-18

Review 3.  A Systematic Review of the Factors that Patients Use to Choose their Surgeon.

Authors:  Alexander T Yahanda; Kelly J Lafaro; Gaya Spolverato; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Total hip arthroplasty: what information do we offer patients on websites of hospitals?

Authors:  Jaap J J Brunnekreef; Berend W Schreurs
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Patient and Caregiver Considerations and Priorities When Selecting Hospitals for Complex Cancer Care.

Authors:  Zhi Ven Fong; Pei-Wen Lim; Ryan Hendrix; Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo; Ryan D Nipp; James M Lindberg; Giles F Whalen; William Kastrinakis; Motaz Qadan; Cristina R Ferrone; Andrew L Warshaw; Keith D Lillemoe; David C Chang; Lara N Traeger
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.339

6.  Patients' expectations of variation in quality of care relates to their search for comparative performance information.

Authors:  Nicole A B M Ketelaar; Marjan J Faber; Jozé C Braspenning; Gert P Westert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Characterizing Patient Preferences Surrounding Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  John M Reuter; Carolyn A Hutyra; Cary S Politzer; Christopher C Calixte; Daniel J Scott; David E Attarian; Richard C Mather
Journal:  JB JS Open Access       Date:  2018-10-23

8.  Understanding and using comparative healthcare information; the effect of the amount of information and consumer characteristics and skills.

Authors:  Nicolien C Zwijnenberg; Michelle Hendriks; Olga C Damman; Evelien Bloemendal; Sonja Wendel; Judith D de Jong; Jany Rademakers
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis.

Authors:  Albine Moser; Irene Korstjens
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 1.904

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.