Literature DB >> 20726787

In-vitro evaluation of a soft-tissue navigation system for laparoscopic prostatectomy.

Dogu Teber1, Tobias Simpfendörfer, Selcuk Guven, Matthias Baumhauer, Ali Serdar Gözen, Jens Rassweiler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We introduce a custom-designed phantom model for the in-vitro evaluation of an augmented reality-based soft-tissue navigation system for ultrasound-guided prostate interventions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transrectal ultrasound segmentation of the prostate, navigation aid placement, initial registration, endoscope tracking, and enhanced visualization steps in the navigation procedure were performed to accommodate the actual prostatic motion. In-vitro laparoscopic manipulations simulating surgical procedures were performed by a physician using human prostate specimens. The target visualization error, defining the accuracy of the tracking, is determined by means of a leave-out test strategy by alternately using four navigation aids for endoscope registration and the remaining two navigation aids for accuracy verification.
RESULTS: The introduction of the navigation aids lasted approximately 3 minutes. The navigation aids and especially their barbs were visible because of their ultrasound reflecting nature. For each organ, 1000 endoscope registrations were calculated, in which two randomly chosen navigation aids served the purpose of verifying the pose. We were able to demonstrate that the superimposed image could follow automatically the videoendoscopic real-time view. The mean target visualization errors for the respective trials were determined as 0.81 (±0.12) mm, 0.62 (±0.14) mm, and 0.98 (±0.23) mm.
CONCLUSIONS: The ultrasound-based inside-out navigation system for laparoscopic prostatectomy overcomes the problem of tissue shift and deformation in an in-vitro model. In case of organ movement, the augmented picture with the detected navigation aids could follow the videoendoscopic image using the navigation aids as landmarks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20726787     DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  4 in total

Review 1.  Image-guided robotic interventions for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ashwin N Sridhar; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Erik K Mayer; Philip J Pratt; Philip J Edwards; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara W Darzi; Justin A Vale
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  [Robotics and intraoperative navigation].

Authors:  D S Schoeb; J Rassweiler; A Sigle; A Miernik; C Engels; A S Goezen; D Teber
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  The impact of 3D models on positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Cristian Fiori; Francesco Porpiglia; Enrico Checcucci; Angela Pecoraro; Daniele Amparore; Sabrina De Cillis; Stefano Granato; Gabriele Volpi; Michele Sica; Paolo Verri; Alberto Piana; Pietro Piazzolla; Matteo Manfredi; Enrico Vezzetti; Michele Di Dio
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.661

4.  Mobile, real-time, and point-of-care augmented reality is robust, accurate, and feasible: a prospective pilot study.

Authors:  Hannes Götz Kenngott; Anas Amin Preukschas; Martin Wagner; Felix Nickel; Michael Müller; Nadine Bellemann; Christian Stock; Markus Fangerau; Boris Radeleff; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Lena Maier-Hein; Beat Peter Müller-Stich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 4.584

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.