Literature DB >> 20723083

Incidence and predictors of permanent pacemaker requirement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a self-expanding bioprosthesis.

Nuno Dias Ferreira1, Daniel Caeiro, Luís Adão, Marco Oliveira, Helena Gonçalves, José Ribeiro, Madalena Teixeira, Aníbal Albuquerque, João Primo, Pedro Braga, Lino Simões, Vasco Gama Ribeiro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous reports have suggested the occurrence of cardiac conduction disorders and permanent pacemaker (PPM) requirement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Based on a single-center experience, we aim to assess the incidence of postprocedural conduction disorders, need for PPM, and its determinants after TAVI with a self-expanding bioprosthesis.
METHODS: From August 2007 to October 2009, 32 consecutive patients underwent TAVI with the Medtronic CoreValve (MCV) System (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Three patients paced at baseline and two cases of procedure-related mortality were excluded. We analyzed the 12-lead electrocardiogram at baseline, immediately after procedure and at discharge. Requirements for PPM were documented and potential clinical, electrophysiological, echocardiographic, and procedural predictors of PPM requirement were studied.
RESULTS: After TAVI, eight patients (29.6%) required PPM implantation due to high-grade atrioventricular (AV) block. The prevalence of left bundle branch block increased from 13.8% to 57.7% directly after implantation (P = 0.001). Need for PPM was correlated to the depth of prosthesis implantation (r = 0.590; P = 0.001). At a cutoff point of 10.1 mm, the likelihood of pacemaker could be predicted with 87.5% sensitivity and 74% specificity and a receiver operator characteristic curve area of 0.86 ± 0.07 (P = 0.003). Of the seven patients with preexisting right bundle branch block (RBBB), four (57.1%) required PPM implantation after TAVI.
CONCLUSIONS: High-grade AV block requiring PPM implantation is a common complication following TAVI and could be predicted by a deeper implantation of the prosthesis. Patients with preexisting RBBB also seem to be at risk for the development of high-grade AV block and subsequent pacemaker implantation. ©2010, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20723083     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02870.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  12 in total

Review 1.  Clinical significance of conduction disturbances after aortic valve intervention: current evidence.

Authors:  Manuel Martinez-Selles; Peter Bramlage; Martin Thoenes; Gerhard Schymik
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after TAVR - Predictors and Impact on Outcomes.

Authors:  Marcel Weber; Jan-Malte Sinning; Christoph Hammerstingl; Nikos Werner; Eberhard Grube; Georg Nickenig
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2015-05

3.  Incidence rate and predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with self-expanding CoreValve prosthesis.

Authors:  Valeria Calvi; Sergio Conti; Giusi Paola Pruiti; Davide Capodanno; Euglena Puzzangara; Donatella Tempio; Angelo Di Grazia; Gian Paolo Ussia; Corrado Tamburino
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Predictors for permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing transfemoral aortic valve implantation with the Edwards Sapien 3 valve.

Authors:  Birgid Gonska; Julia Seeger; Mirjam Keßler; Alexander von Keil; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Jochen Wöhrle
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-10       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  Ongoing requirement for pacing post-transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Alexander D Simms; Andrew J Hogarth; Elizabeth A Hudson; Victoria L Worsnop; Daniel J Blackman; David J O'Regan; Muzahir H Tayebjee
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-04-25

6.  Towards real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance guided transarterial CoreValve implantation: in vivo evaluation in swine.

Authors:  Philipp Kahlert; Nina Parohl; Juliane Albert; Lena Schäfer; Renate Reinhardt; Gernot M Kaiser; Ian McDougall; Brad Decker; Björn Plicht; Raimund Erbel; Holger Eggebrecht; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 7.  New conduction abnormalities after TAVI--frequency and causes.

Authors:  Robert M van der Boon; Rutger-Jan Nuis; Nicolas M Van Mieghem; Luc Jordaens; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Ron T van Domburg; Patrick W Serruys; Robert H Anderson; Peter P T de Jaegere
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Incidence of late occurring bradyarrhythmias after TAVI with the self-expanding CoreValve(®) aortic bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Emmanuel Chorianopoulos; Ulrike Krumsdorf; Sven T Pleger; Hugo A Katus; Raffi Bekeredjian
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-18       Impact factor: 5.460

9.  Predictive factors for pacemaker requirement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Ibrahim Akin; Stephan Kische; Lylia Paranskaya; Henrik Schneider; Tim C Rehders; Ulrich Trautwein; Gökmen Turan; Dietmar Bänsch; Olga Thiele; Dimitar Divchev; Ilkay Bozdag-Turan; Jasmin Ortak; Gunther Kundt; Christoph A Nienaber; Hüseyin Ince
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2012-10-04       Impact factor: 2.298

10.  A review of most relevant complications of transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab; Robert E Michler
Journal:  ISRN Cardiol       Date:  2013-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.