Literature DB >> 20722420

Direct measurement of mercury(II) removal from organomercurial lyase (MerB) by tryptophan fluorescence: NmerA domain of coevolved γ-proteobacterial mercuric ion reductase (MerA) is more efficient than MerA catalytic core or glutathione .

Baoyu Hong1, Rachel Nauss, Ian M Harwood, Susan M Miller.   

Abstract

Aerobic and facultative bacteria and archaea harboring mer loci exhibit resistance to the toxic effects of Hg(II) and organomercurials [RHg(I)]. In broad spectrum resistance, RHg(I) is converted to less toxic Hg(0) in the cytosol by the sequential action of organomercurial lyase (MerB: RHg(I) → RH + Hg(II)) and mercuric ion reductase (MerA: Hg(II) → Hg(0)) enzymes, requiring transfer of Hg(II) from MerB to MerA. Although previous studies with γ-proteobacterial versions of MerA and a nonphysiological Hg(II)-DTT-MerB complex qualitatively support a pathway for direct transfer between proteins, assessment of the relative efficiencies of Hg(II) transfer to the two different dicysteine motifs in γ-proteobacterial MerA and to competing cellular thiol is lacking. Here we show the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence of γ-proteobacterial MerB is sensitive to Hg(II) binding and use this to probe the kinetics of Hg(II) removal from MerB by the N-terminal domain (NmerA) and catalytic core C-terminal cysteine pairs of its coevolved MerA and by glutathione (GSH), the major competing cellular thiol in γ-proteobacteria. At physiologically relevant concentrations, reaction with a 10-fold excess of NmerA over HgMerB removes ≥92% Hg(II), while similar extents of reaction require more than 1000-fold excess of GSH. Kinetically, the apparent second-order rate constant for Hg(II) transfer from MerB to NmerA, at (2.3 ± 0.1) × 10(4) M(-1) s(-1), is ∼100-fold greater than that for GSH ((1.2 ± 0.2) × 10(2) M(-1) s(-1)) or the MerA catalytic core (1.2 × 10(2) M(-1) s(-1)), establishing transfer to the metallochaperone-like NmerA domain as the kinetically favored pathway in this coevolved system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20722420      PMCID: PMC3042367          DOI: 10.1021/bi100802k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  33 in total

1.  The mercuric and organomercurial detoxifying enzymes from a plasmid-bearing strain of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  J L Schottel
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1978-06-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 2.  Organization, expression, and evolution of genes for mercury resistance.

Authors:  A O Summers
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 15.500

3.  Bacterial organomercurial lyase: overproduction, isolation, and characterization.

Authors:  T P Begley; A E Walts; C T Walsh
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1986-11-04       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Cloning and DNA sequence of the mercuric- and organomercurial-resistance determinants of plasmid pDU1358.

Authors:  H G Griffin; T J Foster; S Silver; T K Misra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Mechanistic studies of a protonolytic organomercurial cleaving enzyme: bacterial organomercurial lyase.

Authors:  T P Begley; A E Walts; C T Walsh
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1986-11-04       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Physical and genetic map of the organomercury resistance (Omr) and inorganic mercury resistance (Hgr) loci of the IncM plasmid R831b.

Authors:  H I Ogawa; C L Tolle; A O Summers
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  Mercuric reductase. Purification and characterization of a transposon-encoded flavoprotein containing an oxidation-reduction-active disulfide.

Authors:  B Fox; C T Walsh
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1982-03-10       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Cloning and DNA sequence analysis of the mercury resistance genes of Streptomyces lividans.

Authors:  R Sedlmeier; J Altenbuchner
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1992-12

9.  Studies on Hg(II)-induced H2O2 formation and oxidative stress in vivo and in vitro in rat kidney mitochondria.

Authors:  B O Lund; D M Miller; J S Woods
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1993-05-25       Impact factor: 5.858

10.  Evidence for the participation of Cys558 and Cys559 at the active site of mercuric reductase.

Authors:  S M Miller; M J Moore; V Massey; C H Williams; M D Distefano; D P Ballou; C T Walsh
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1989-02-07       Impact factor: 3.162

View more
  4 in total

1.  Role of MerH in mercury resistance in the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus.

Authors:  James Schelert; Deepak Rudrappa; Tyler Johnson; Paul Blum
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2013-04-25       Impact factor: 2.777

2.  Structural and Biochemical Characterization of Organotin and Organolead Compounds Binding to the Organomercurial Lyase MerB Provide New Insights into Its Mechanism of Carbon-Metal Bond Cleavage.

Authors:  Haytham M Wahba; Michael J Stevenson; Ahmed Mansour; Jurgen Sygusch; Dean E Wilcox; James G Omichinski
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Organic and inorganic mercurials have distinct effects on cellular thiols, metal homeostasis, and Fe-binding proteins in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Stephen P LaVoie; Daphne T Mapolelo; Darin M Cowart; Benjamin J Polacco; Michael K Johnson; Robert A Scott; Susan M Miller; Anne O Summers
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.358

4.  Mechanistic pathways of mercury removal from the organomercurial lyase active site.

Authors:  Pedro J Silva; Viviana Rodrigues
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.