Literature DB >> 20722393

In-tube extraction of volatile organic compounds from aqueous samples: an economical alternative to purge and trap enrichment.

Jens Laaks1, Maik A Jochmann, Beat Schilling, Torsten C Schmidt.   

Abstract

A novel in-tube extraction device (ITEX 2) for headspace sampling was evaluated for GC/MS analysis of aqueous samples. Twenty compounds of regulatory and drinking water quality importance were analyzed, including halogenated hydrocarbons, BTEX compounds (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes), fuel oxygenates, geosmin, and 2-methylisoborneol. Five commercially available sorbent traps were compared for their compound specific extraction yield. On the basis of the results, a mixed bed trap was prepared and evaluated. The extraction parameters were optimized to yield maximum sensitivity within the time of a GC run, to avoid unnecessary downtime of the system. Method detection limits of 1-10 ng L(-1) were achieved for volatile organic compounds (VOCs), which is much lower than demands by regulatory limit values. The performance of the ITEX system is similar to that of purge and trap systems, but it requires lower sample volumes and is less prone to contamination, much simpler, more flexible, and affordable. Average relative standard deviations below 10% were achieved for all analytes, and recoveries from spiked tap water samples were between 90% and 103%, mostly. The extraction is nonexhaustive, removing a fraction of 7% to 55% of the target compounds, depending on the air-water partitioning coefficients. The method was also tested with nonsynthetic samples, including tap, pond, and reservoir water and different soft drinks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20722393     DOI: 10.1021/ac101414t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  5 in total

1.  Metabolic profiling of oxidized lipid-derived volatiles in blood by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry with in-tube extraction.

Authors:  Shoji Kakuta; Yasuhiko Bando; Shin Nishiumi; Masaru Yoshida; Eiichiro Fukusaki; Takeshi Bamba
Journal:  Mass Spectrom (Tokyo)       Date:  2013-04-26

2.  In-tube dynamic extraction for analysis of volatile organic compounds in honey samples.

Authors:  Wiebke Kaziur-Cegla; Maik A Jochmann; Karl Molt; Andreas Bruchmann; Torsten C Schmidt
Journal:  Food Chem X       Date:  2022-05-18

3.  Optimization strategies of in-tube extraction (ITEX) methods.

Authors:  Jens Laaks; Maik A Jochmann; Beat Schilling; Torsten C Schmidt
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 4.142

4.  Unbiased profiling of volatile organic compounds in the headspace of Allium plants using an in-tube extraction device.

Authors:  Miyako Kusano; Makoto Kobayashi; Yumiko Iizuka; Atsushi Fukushima; Kazuki Saito
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2016-02-29

Review 5.  Advanced Solid-Phase Microextraction Techniques and Related Automation: A Review of Commercially Available Technologies.

Authors:  Stefano Dugheri; Nicola Mucci; Giovanni Cappelli; Lucia Trevisani; Alessandro Bonari; Elisabetta Bucaletti; Donato Squillaci; Giulio Arcangeli
Journal:  J Anal Methods Chem       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 2.193

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.