Literature DB >> 20721614

How researchers define vulnerable populations in HIV/AIDS clinical trials.

Sohini Sengupta1, Bernard Lo, Ronald P Strauss, Joseph Eron, Allen L Gifford.   

Abstract

In this study, we interviewed researchers, asking them to define vulnerable populations in HIV/AIDS clinical trials, and provide feedback on the federal regulations for three vulnerable populations. Interview data informed a conceptual framework, and were content analyzed to identify acceptability or disagreement with the regulations. Beginning with several characteristics of vulnerable enrollees identified by researchers, the conceptual framework illustrates possible scenarios of how enrollees could be considered vulnerable in clinical research. Content analysis identified barriers affecting HIV/AIDS researchers' ability to conduct clinical trials with pregnant women, prisoners, and children, for which the regulations specify additional protections. This study challenges current thinking about federal regulations' group-based approach to defining vulnerable populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20721614      PMCID: PMC2975789          DOI: 10.1007/s10461-010-9785-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Behav        ISSN: 1090-7165


  9 in total

1.  Contextualizing the vulnerability standard.

Authors:  Tricha Shivas
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 2.  Clinical research: protection of the "vulnerable"?

Authors:  Stephanie S Park; Mitchell H Grayson
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 3.  Exploring the concepts of vulnerability and resilience in the context of HIV infection.

Authors:  Joseph De Santis
Journal:  Res Theory Nurs Pract       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Ethical issues in research with homeless youths.

Authors:  Josephine Ensign; Seth Ammerman
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  The limitations of "vulnerability" as a protection for human research participants.

Authors:  Carol Levine; Ruth Faden; Christine Grady; Dale Hammerschmidt; Lisa Eckenwiler; Jeremy Sugarman
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.229

Review 6.  Nursing research and the prevention of infectious diseases among vulnerable populations.

Authors:  Nilda Peragallo; Rosa M Gonzalez
Journal:  Annu Rev Nurs Res       Date:  2007

7.  Opinions of researchers based in the UK on recruiting subjects from developing countries into randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Sam K Newton; John Appiah-Poku
Journal:  Dev World Bioeth       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.294

8.  The AIDS Clinical Trials Information Service (ACTIS): a decade of providing clinical trials information.

Authors:  Deborah G Katz; Gale A Dutcher; Theresa A Toigo; Ruthann Bates; Freda Temple; Cynthia G Cadden
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  GPs' experiences of primary care mental health research: a qualitative study of the barriers to recruitment.

Authors:  V L Mason; A Shaw; N J Wiles; J Mulligan; T J Peters; D Sharp; G Lewis
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2007-08-14       Impact factor: 2.267

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  The concept of 'vulnerability' in research ethics: an in-depth analysis of policies and guidelines.

Authors:  Dearbhail Bracken-Roche; Emily Bell; Mary Ellen Macdonald; Eric Racine
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2017-02-07

2.  Factors Contributing to Exacerbating Vulnerabilities in Global Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Ricardo E da Silva; Angélica A Amato; Dirce B Guilhem; Marta R de Carvalho; Elisangela da C Lima; Maria Rita C G Novaes
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 5.810

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.