BACKGROUND: Eating in the absence of hunger (EAH) is typically assessed by measuring youths' intake of palatable snack foods after a standard meal designed to reduce hunger. Because energy intake required to reach satiety varies among individuals, a standard meal may not ensure the absence of hunger among participants of all weight strata. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare adolescents' EAH observed after access to a very large food array with EAH observed after a standardized meal. DESIGN:Seventy-eight adolescents participated in a randomized crossover study during which EAH was measured as intake of palatable snacks after ad libitum access to a very large array of lunch-type foods (>10,000 kcal) and after a lunch meal standardized to provide 50% of the daily estimated energy requirements. RESULTS: The adolescents consumed more energy and reported less hunger after the large-array meal than after the standardized meal (P values < 0.001). They consumed ≈70 kcal less EAH after the large-array meal than after the standardized meal (295 ± 18 compared with 365 ± 20 kcal; P < 0.001), but EAH intakes after the large-array meal and after the standardized meal were positively correlated (P values < 0.001). The body mass index z score and overweight were positively associated with EAH in both paradigms after age, sex, race, pubertal stage, and meal intake were controlled for (P values ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION: EAH is observable and positively related to body weight regardless of whether youth eat in the absence of hunger from a very large-array meal or from a standardized meal. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00631644.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Eating in the absence of hunger (EAH) is typically assessed by measuring youths' intake of palatable snack foods after a standard meal designed to reduce hunger. Because energy intake required to reach satiety varies among individuals, a standard meal may not ensure the absence of hunger among participants of all weight strata. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare adolescents' EAH observed after access to a very large food array with EAH observed after a standardized meal. DESIGN: Seventy-eight adolescents participated in a randomized crossover study during which EAH was measured as intake of palatable snacks after ad libitum access to a very large array of lunch-type foods (>10,000 kcal) and after a lunch meal standardized to provide 50% of the daily estimated energy requirements. RESULTS: The adolescents consumed more energy and reported less hunger after the large-array meal than after the standardized meal (P values < 0.001). They consumed ≈70 kcal less EAH after the large-array meal than after the standardized meal (295 ± 18 compared with 365 ± 20 kcal; P < 0.001), but EAH intakes after the large-array meal and after the standardized meal were positively correlated (P values < 0.001). The body mass index z score and overweight were positively associated with EAH in both paradigms after age, sex, race, pubertal stage, and meal intake were controlled for (P values ≤ 0.05). CONCLUSION:EAH is observable and positively related to body weight regardless of whether youth eat in the absence of hunger from a very large-array meal or from a standardized meal. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00631644.
Authors: M B Livingstone; A M Prentice; W A Coward; J J Strain; A E Black; P S Davies; C M Stewart; P G McKenna; R G Whitehead Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 1992-07 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: R J Kuczmarski; C L Ogden; L M Grummer-Strawn; K M Flegal; S S Guo; R Wei; Z Mei; L R Curtin; A F Roche; C L Johnson Journal: Adv Data Date: 2000-06-08
Authors: Lauren B Shomaker; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff; Mira Mooreville; Samantha A Reina; Amber B Courville; Sara E Field; Brittany E Matheson; Sheila M Brady; Susan Z Yanovski; Jack A Yanovski Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Nichole R Kelly; Lauren B Shomaker; Courtney K Pickworth; Mariya V Grygorenko; Rachel M Radin; Anna Vannucci; Lisa M Shank; Sheila M Brady; Amber B Courville; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff; Jack A Yanovski Journal: Appetite Date: 2015-04-29 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Shelly K Annameier; Nichole R Kelly; Amber B Courville; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff; Jack A Yanovski; Lauren B Shomaker Journal: Appetite Date: 2018-01-31 Impact factor: 3.868
Authors: Monika M K Stojek; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff; Lauren B Shomaker; Nichole R Kelly; Katherine A Thompson; Rim D Mehari; Shannon E Marwitz; Andrew P Demidowich; Ovidiu A Galescu; Sheila M Brady; Susan Z Yanovski; Jack A Yanovski Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2016-10-18 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Jerica M Berge; Jonathan Miller; Sara Veblen-Mortenson; Alicia Kunin-Batson; Nancy E Sherwood; Simone A French Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Thomas G Power; Yadira A Olivera; Rachael A Hill; Ashley D Beck; Veronica Hopwood; Karina Silva Garcia; Guadalupe G Ramos; Jennifer Orlet Fisher; Teresia M O'Connor; Sheryl O Hughes Journal: Appetite Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 3.868