Literature DB >> 20719923

Equal degrees of object selectivity for upper and lower visual field stimuli.

Lars Strother1, Adrian Aldcroft, Cheryl Lavell, Tutis Vilis.   

Abstract

Functional MRI (fMRI) studies of the human object recognition system commonly identify object-selective cortical regions by comparing blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) responses to objects versus those to scrambled objects. Object selectivity distinguishes human lateral occipital cortex (LO) from earlier visual areas. Recent studies suggest that, in addition to being object selective, LO is retinotopically organized; LO represents both object and location information. Although LO responses to objects have been shown to depend on location, it is not known whether responses to scrambled objects vary similarly. This is important because it would suggest that the degree of object selectivity in LO does not vary with retinal stimulus position. We used a conventional functional localizer to identify human visual area LO by comparing BOLD responses to objects versus scrambled objects presented to either the upper (UVF) or lower (LVF) visual field. In agreement with recent findings, we found evidence of position-dependent responses to objects. However, we observed the same degree of position dependence for scrambled objects and thus object selectivity did not differ for UVF and LVF stimuli. We conclude that, in terms of BOLD response, LO discriminates objects from non-objects equally well in either visual field location, despite stronger responses to objects in the LVF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20719923     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00462.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  6 in total

1.  Reaction times for allocentric movements are 35 ms slower than reaction times for target-directed movements.

Authors:  Lore Thaler; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  An fMRI study of visual hemifield integration and cerebral lateralization.

Authors:  Lars Strother; Zhiheng Zhou; Alexandra K Coros; Tutis Vilis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-04-07       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Visual recognition of mirrored letters and the right hemisphere advantage for mirror-invariant object recognition.

Authors:  Matthew T Harrison; Lars Strother
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

4.  Face inversion reduces the persistence of global form and its neural correlates.

Authors:  Lars Strother; Pavagada S Mathuranath; Adrian Aldcroft; Cheryl Lavell; Melvyn A Goodale; Tutis Vilis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Regional neural response differences in the determination of faces or houses positioned in a wide visual field.

Authors:  Bin Wang; Tianyi Yan; Jinglong Wu; Kewei Chen; Satoshi Imajyo; Seiichiro Ohno; Susumu Kanazawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Commentary: Episodic Memory Retrieval Functionally Relies on Very Rapid Reactivation of Sensory Information.

Authors:  Holly J Bowen; Sarah M Kark
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.169

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.