BACKGROUND: In utero exposure to tobacco smoking has been suggested to cause persistent alterations in cognitive functioning. We examined if mothers' smoking during pregnancy (SDP) is associated with long-term impairment in offspring stress coping and the causal mechanism behind a possible link. METHODS: We used a large cohort (n = 187,106) of young males in Sweden (mean age = 18.2 years), who underwent a semi-structured psychological assessment in 1997-2006, including an evaluation of stress coping ability, as part of the compulsory military conscript examination. We compared differentially exposed siblings within nuclear families and cousins in extended families and used multilevel structural equation models to disentangle genetic from environmental contributions to the association between SDP and stress coping. RESULTS: SDP and offspring stress coping was moderately strongly associated when comparing unrelated individuals [regression coefficient (b) = -0.38 on a nine-point scale; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.40 to -0.36, P < 0.0001]. In contrast, it disappeared when siblings were compared (b = 0.11; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.23, P = 0.071). This familial confounding was entirely due to genetic influences. CONCLUSIONS: SDP is an established risk factor for pregnancy- and birth-related complications. However, we found no long-term effect of SDP on offspring stress coping. Rather, the observed association was due to familial confounding of genetic origin; women prone to SDP also transmit genes to their children that are associated with poorer coping with stress.
BACKGROUND: In utero exposure to tobacco smoking has been suggested to cause persistent alterations in cognitive functioning. We examined if mothers' smoking during pregnancy (SDP) is associated with long-term impairment in offspring stress coping and the causal mechanism behind a possible link. METHODS: We used a large cohort (n = 187,106) of young males in Sweden (mean age = 18.2 years), who underwent a semi-structured psychological assessment in 1997-2006, including an evaluation of stress coping ability, as part of the compulsory military conscript examination. We compared differentially exposed siblings within nuclear families and cousins in extended families and used multilevel structural equation models to disentangle genetic from environmental contributions to the association between SDP and stress coping. RESULTS: SDP and offspring stress coping was moderately strongly associated when comparing unrelated individuals [regression coefficient (b) = -0.38 on a nine-point scale; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.40 to -0.36, P < 0.0001]. In contrast, it disappeared when siblings were compared (b = 0.11; 95% CI -0.01 to 0.23, P = 0.071). This familial confounding was entirely due to genetic influences. CONCLUSIONS: SDP is an established risk factor for pregnancy- and birth-related complications. However, we found no long-term effect of SDP on offspring stress coping. Rather, the observed association was due to familial confounding of genetic origin; women prone to SDP also transmit genes to their children that are associated with poorer coping with stress.
Authors: Patrik K E Magnusson; David Gunnell; Per Tynelius; George Davey Smith; Finn Rasmussen Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Brian M D'Onofrio; Carol A Van Hulle; Irwin D Waldman; Joseph Lee Rodgers; K Paige Harden; Paul J Rathouz; Benjamin B Lahey Journal: Dev Psychopathol Date: 2008
Authors: Ryne Estabrook; Suena H Massey; Caron A C Clark; James L Burns; Brian S Mustanski; Edwin H Cook; T Caitlin O'Brien; Beth Makowski; Kimberly A Espy; Lauren S Wakschlag Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2015-11-18 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Suena H Massey; David Reiss; Jenae M Neiderhiser; Leslie D Leve; Daniel S Shaw; Jody M Ganiban Journal: Neurotoxicol Teratol Date: 2015-12-02 Impact factor: 3.763
Authors: Brian M D'Onofrio; Quetzal A Class; Martin E Rickert; Ayesha C Sujan; Henrik Larsson; Ralf Kuja-Halkola; Arvid Sjölander; Catarina Almqvist; Paul Lichtenstein; A Sara Oberg Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2015-11-21 Impact factor: 2.805
Authors: Jarrod M Ellingson; Jackson A Goodnight; Carol A Van Hulle; Irwin D Waldman; Brian M D'Onofrio Journal: Behav Genet Date: 2013-10-02 Impact factor: 2.805