Literature DB >> 20718576

Attention to hierarchical level influences attentional selection of spatial scale.

Anastasia V Flevaris1, Shlomo Bentin, Lynn C Robertson.   

Abstract

Ample evidence suggests that global perception may involve low spatial frequency (LSF) processing and that local perception may involve high spatial frequency (HSF) processing (Shulman, Sullivan, Gish, & Sakoda, 1986; Shulman & Wilson, 1987; Robertson, 1996). It is debated whether SF selection is a low-level mechanism associating global and local information with absolute LSF and HSF content, or whether it is a higher level mechanism involving a selective process that defines the SF range in which global and local can then be relatively defined. The present study provides support for the latter claim by demonstrating that allocating attention to global or local levels of hierarchical displays biased selection of LSFs or HSFs, respectively, in subsequently presented compound gratings. This bias occurred despite a change in the response dimension (from letter identification in the hierarchical stimulus to orientation discrimination in the grating) and despite a difference in retinal location of the hierarchical stimuli and the grating stimulus. Moreover, the bias was determined by the relationship between the 2 SFs in the compound grating (i.e., their relative frequency) rather than the absolute SF values. (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20718576      PMCID: PMC3035717          DOI: 10.1037/a0019251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  26 in total

1.  Spatial frequencies as a medium for guiding attention: comment on Lamb, Yund, and Pond (1999)

Authors:  L C Robertson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1999-03

Review 2.  Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization.

Authors:  L C Robertson; M R Lamb
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Neural mechanisms of global and local processing. A combined PET and ERP study.

Authors:  H J Heinze; H Hinrichs; M Scholz; W Burchert; G R Mangun
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Attentional persistence for features of hierarchical patterns.

Authors:  L C Robertson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-09

5.  Processing of global and local properties--an analysis with event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  S Han; L Chen
Journal:  Sci China C Life Sci       Date:  1996-04

6.  Hemispheric asymmetries in global and local processing: evidence from fMRI.

Authors:  A Martinez; P Moses; L Frank; R Buxton; E Wong; J Stiles
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-05-06       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Spatial frequency and selective attention to local and global information.

Authors:  G L Shulman; J Wilson
Journal:  Perception       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  'Part-whole' processing in unilateral brain-damaged patients: dysfunction of hierarchical organization.

Authors:  L C Robertson; D C Delis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Electrophysiological correlates of hierarchical stimulus processing: dissociation between onset and later stages of global and local target processing.

Authors:  H J Heinze; T F Münte
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Interactions between spatial attention and global/local feature selection: an ERP study.

Authors:  S Han; W Liu; E W Yund; D L Woods
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-08-21       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  12 in total

1.  Shifts in attentional scope modulate event-related potentials evoked by reward.

Authors:  Ajay Nadig; Nicholas J Kelley; Narun Pornpattananangkul; James E Glazer; Robin Nusslock
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Local and global level-priming occurs for hierarchical stimuli composed of outlined, but not filled-in, elements.

Authors:  Alexandra List; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Attentional selection of relative SF mediates global versus local processing: evidence from EEG.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Shlomo Bentin; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Local or global? Attentional selection of spatial frequencies binds shapes to hierarchical levels.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Shlomo Bentin; Lynn C Robertson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2010-01-22

5.  The Time Sequence of Face Spatial Frequency Differs During Working Memory Encoding and Retrieval Stages.

Authors:  Anqing Wang; Enguang Chen; Hang Zhang; Chinheg H Borjigin; Hailing Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-05-20

6.  Effects of stimulus type and level repetition on content-level binding in global/local processing.

Authors:  Ronald Hübner; Rana Kruse
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-06-20

7.  Attending to global versus local stimulus features modulates neural processing of low versus high spatial frequencies: an analysis with event-related brain potentials.

Authors:  Anastasia V Flevaris; Antigona Martínez; Steven A Hillyard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-04-09

8.  Attentional selection of levels within hierarchically organized figures is mediated by object-files.

Authors:  Mitchell J Valdés-Sosa; Jorge Iglesias-Fuster; Rosario Torres
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-16

9.  Distinct spatial scale sensitivities for early categorization of faces and places: neuromagnetic and behavioral findings.

Authors:  Bhuvanesh Awasthi; Paul F Sowman; Jason Friedman; Mark A Williams
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Global and local processing near the left and right hands.

Authors:  Robin M Langerak; Carina L La Mantia; Liana E Brown
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-10-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.