Literature DB >> 20718574

Trial-to-trial modulations of the Simon effect in conditions of attentional limitations: Evidence from dual tasks.

Rico Fischer1, Franziska Plessow, Wilfried Kunde, Andrea Kiesel.   

Abstract

Interference effects are reduced after trials including response conflict. This sequential modulation has often been attributed to a top-down mediated adaptive control mechanism and/or to feature repetition mechanisms. In the present study we tested whether mechanisms responsible for such sequential modulations are subject to attentional limitations under dual-task situations. Participants performed a Simon task in mixed single- and dual-task contexts (Experiment 1), in blocked contexts with dual-task load either, in trialN (Experiment 2a), in trialN-1 (Experiment 2b), or in both trials (Experiment 3). Results showed that the occurrence of a sequential modulation did not depend on dual-task load per se as it occurred predominantly in conditions of lowest and highest task load. Instead, task factors such as the repetition of task episodes and stimulus-response repetitions determined whether a sequential modulation occurred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20718574     DOI: 10.1037/a0019326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  10 in total

1.  Effects of feature integration in a hands-crossed version of the Social Simon paradigm.

Authors:  Roman Liepelt; Dorit Wenke; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-02-17

2.  Working memory demands modulate cognitive control in the Stroop paradigm.

Authors:  Alexander Soutschek; Tilo Strobach; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-03-06

3.  If it's hard to read… try harder! Processing fluency as signal for effort adjustments.

Authors:  Gesine Dreisbach; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-01-06

4.  Shifts in target modality cause attentional reset: Evidence from sequential modulation of crossmodal congruency effects.

Authors:  Magali Kreutzfeldt; Denise N Stephan; Klaus Willmes; Iring Koch
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

Review 5.  Monitoring and control in multitasking.

Authors:  Stefanie Schuch; David Dignath; Marco Steinhauser; Markus Janczyk
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

Review 6.  Conflict monitoring and the affective-signaling hypothesis-An integrative review.

Authors:  David Dignath; Andreas B Eder; Marco Steinhauser; Andrea Kiesel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

Review 7.  What determines the specificity of conflict adaptation? A review, critical analysis, and proposed synthesis.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Elger L Abrahamse; Wout Duthoo; Wim Notebaert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-08

8.  Adaptive effort investment in cognitive and physical tasks: a neurocomputational model.

Authors:  Tom Verguts; Eliana Vassena; Massimo Silvetti
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 3.558

9.  Does conflict help or hurt cognitive control? Initial evidence for an inverted U-shape relationship between perceived task difficulty and conflict adaptation.

Authors:  Henk van Steenbergen; Guido P H Band; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-10

10.  The influence of negative stimulus features on conflict adaption: evidence from fluency of processing.

Authors:  Julia Fritz; Rico Fischer; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-02-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.