Literature DB >> 20718565

How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location.

Wessel O van Dam1, Bernhard Hommel.   

Abstract

Given the distributed representation of visual features in the human brain, binding mechanisms are necessary to integrate visual information about the same perceptual event. It has been assumed that feature codes are bound into object files--pointers to the neural codes of the features of a given event. The present study investigated the perceptual criteria underlying integration into an object file. Previous studies confounded the sharing of spatial location with belongingness to the same perceptual object, 2 factors we tried to disentangle. Our findings suggest that orientation and color features appearing in a task-irrelevant preview display were integrated irrespective of whether they appeared as part of the same object or of different objects (e.g., 1 stationary and the other moving continuously, or a banana in a particular orientation overlaying an apple of a particular color). In contrast, integration was markedly reduced when the 2 objects were separated in space. Taken together, these findings suggest that spatial overlap of visual features is a sufficient criterion for integrating them into the same object file. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20718565     DOI: 10.1037/a0019955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  11 in total

1.  Remember the touch: tactile distractors retrieve previous responses to targets.

Authors:  Birte Moeller; Christian Frings
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Come together, right now: dynamic overwriting of an object's history through common fate.

Authors:  Roy Luria; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Multiple cueing dissociates location- and feature-based repetition effects.

Authors:  Kesong Hu; Junya Zhan; Bingzhao Li; Shuchang He; Arthur G Samuel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  What's in a "face file"? Feature binding with facial identity, emotion, and gaze direction.

Authors:  Daniel Fitousi
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-06-17

5.  Power of instructions for task implementation: superiority of explicitly instructed over inferred rules.

Authors:  Maayan Pereg; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-01-30

6.  Dopamine, norepinephrine, and the management of sensorimotor bindings: individual differences in updating of stimulus-response episodes are predicted by DAT1, but not DBH5'-ins/del.

Authors:  Lorenza S Colzato; Sharon Zmigrod; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Renewing the respect for similarity.

Authors:  Shimon Edelman; Reza Shahbazi
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Binding between Responses is not Modulated by Grouping of Response Effects.

Authors:  Silvia Selimi; Christian Frings; Birte Moeller
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2022-08-01

9.  Perceived object continuity and spontaneous retrieval of features from an inhibited object.

Authors:  Zhe Chen; Yei-Yu Yeh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reduction of the spatial stroop effect by peripheral cueing as a function of the presence/absence of placeholders.

Authors:  Chunming Luo; Juan Lupiáñez; María Jesús Funes; Xiaolan Fu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.