Literature DB >> 23681294

Dopamine, norepinephrine, and the management of sensorimotor bindings: individual differences in updating of stimulus-response episodes are predicted by DAT1, but not DBH5'-ins/del.

Lorenza S Colzato1, Sharon Zmigrod, Bernhard Hommel.   

Abstract

Evidence suggests that the flexibility of managing (creating and updating) stimulus-response bindings is driven by the dopaminergic system. Given that striatal dopamine (DA) plays a crucial role in the updating of working memory, the present study tested whether individual differences in the efficiency of updating stimulus-response episodes (event files) are predicted by differences in genetic predisposition related to the efficiency of the striatal dopaminergic pathway. In view of contrasting claims that stimulus-response binding is related to norepinephrine, we also considered genetic predispositions regarding noradrenergic pathways. In a sample of 100 healthy adults, we studied whether the degree to which stimulus-response bindings affect ongoing performance is predicted by polymorphisms of the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1, associated with striatal DA levels) and DBH5'-ins/del (strongly correlated with dopamine beta-hydroxylase, the enzyme catalyzing the dopamine-norepinephrine conversion). The performance of 9-repeat carriers of the DAT1 gene was more affected by stimulus-response bindings than the performance of 10/10 homozygotes was, while DBH5'-ins/del polymorphism was not related to performance. This outcome pattern suggests a crucial role of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway in the flexible management of stimulus-response episodes, whereas norepinephrine does not seem to play a role.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23681294     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-013-3553-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  51 in total

1.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action.

Authors:  Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Enhanced behavioral response to repeated d-amphetamine and personality traits in humans.

Authors:  K W Sax; S M Strakowski
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Differential effects of direct and indirect dopamine agonists on eye blink rate in cynomolgus monkeys.

Authors:  M S Kleven; W Koek
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.030

4.  Genetic markers of striatal dopamine predict individual differences in dysfunctional, but not functional impulsivity.

Authors:  L S Colzato; W P M van den Wildenberg; A J W Van der Does; B Hommel
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 3.590

5.  Net influx of plasma 6-[18F]fluoro-L-DOPA (FDOPA) to the ventral striatum correlates with prefrontal processing of affective stimuli.

Authors:  Thomas Siessmeier; Thorsten Kienast; Jana Wrase; Jennifer Lynne Larsen; Dieter F Braus; Michael N Smolka; Hans Georg Buchholz; Mathias Schreckenberger; Frank Rösch; Paul Cumming; Karl Mann; Peter Bartenstein; Andreas Heinz
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Tyrosine depletion attenuates dopamine function in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  C J Harmer; S F McTavish; L Clark; G M Goodwin; P J Cowen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory.

Authors:  Ole Jensen; Jochen Kaiser; Jean-Philippe Lachaux
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  Association and linkage of the dopamine transporter gene and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children: heterogeneity owing to diagnostic subtype and severity.

Authors:  I D Waldman; D C Rowe; A Abramowitz; S T Kozel; J H Mohr; S L Sherman; H H Cleveland; M L Sanders; J M Gard; C Stever
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Is the binding of visual features in working memory resource-demanding?

Authors:  Richard J Allen; Alan D Baddeley; Graham J Hitch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2006-05

Review 10.  Norepinephrine and dopamine as learning signals.

Authors:  Carolyn W Harley
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.599

View more
  8 in total

1.  Decoding Stimulus-Response Representations and Their Stability Using EEG-Based Multivariate Pattern Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Takacs; Moritz Mückschel; Veit Roessner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-05-07

2.  People are different: tyrosine's modulating effect on cognitive control in healthy humans may depend on individual differences related to dopamine function.

Authors:  Bryant J Jongkees; Bernhard Hommel; Lorenza S Colzato
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-06

3.  The effect of gamma-enhancing binaural beats on the control of feature bindings.

Authors:  Lorenza S Colzato; Laura Steenbergen; Roberta Sellaro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Rumination impairs the control of stimulus-induced retrieval of irrelevant information, but not attention, control, or response selection in general.

Authors:  Lorenza S Colzato; Laura Steenbergen; Bernhard Hommel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-01-23

5.  On the functional role of striatal and anterior cingulate GABA+ in stimulus-response binding.

Authors:  Adam Takacs; Ann-Kathrin Stock; Paul Kuntke; Annett Werner; Christian Beste
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 6.  Gilles de la Tourette Syndrome-A Disorder of Action-Perception Integration.

Authors:  Alexander Kleimaker; Maximilian Kleimaker; Tobias Bäumer; Christian Beste; Alexander Münchau
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Perception-Action Integration Is Modulated by the Catecholaminergic System Depending on Learning Experience.

Authors:  Elena Eggert; Annet Bluschke; Adam Takacs; Maximilian Kleimaker; Alexander Münchau; Veit Roessner; Moritz Mückschel; Christian Beste
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 5.176

8.  MAO-A Phenotype Effects Response Sensitivity and the Parietal Old/New Effect during Recognition Memory.

Authors:  Robert S Ross; Andrew Smolen; Tim Curran; Erika Nyhus
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.169

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.