Literature DB >> 20717659

Characterization of housing-related spontaneous variations of gut microbiota and expression of toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in rats.

Evangelina Terán-Ventura1, Mercè Roca, Maria Teresa Martin, Maria Lourdes Abarca, Vicente Martinez, Patri Vergara.   

Abstract

Gut microbiota has been suggested as a key component of gut homeostasis, affecting immune responses within the gut. We determined changes in intestinal commensal bacteria and expression of toll-like receptors (TLR) 2 and 4 in rats bred under microbiologically controlled conditions (barrier), under standard conditions (conventional), and in barrier animals adapted to standard conditions (barrier/conventional). Cecal microbiota was analyzed by plate culture, and fluorescence in situ hybridization and microbial profiles were assessed by terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism. Cecal expression of TLR-2 and TLR-4 was determined by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Total number of cecal bacteria was similar in the three groups. However, the barrier group showed a higher number of strict anaerobic bacteria (Bacteroides spp. and Clostridium spp.) while Bifidobacterium spp. were scarce. Re-housing the barrier-bred rats into conventional conditions led to a microbiota with intermediate characteristics between the barrier and conventional groups. Richness of the cecal microbial ecosystem was similar in the three groups, although a relative time-dependent variation, with highest homogeneity in the barrier group, was observed. Expression levels of TLR-2 and TLR-4 had no clear correlation with the microbiota. These results show that the relative composition of the cecal microbiota in rats varies spontaneously with changes in the environmental conditions, with minor impact in the expression of TLR-2 and TLR-4. These observations might be important in the understanding of variability in animal responses, particularly to immune-related stimuli, when assessed in the context of the environmental/microbiological conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20717659     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-010-9737-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.552


  47 in total

1.  Evaluation of an alternative method for the enumeration and confirmation of Clostridium perfringens from treated and untreated sewages.

Authors:  T Wohlsen; J Bayliss; B Gray; J Bates; M Katouli
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.858

Review 2.  Obesity and the microbiota.

Authors:  Herbert Tilg; Alexander R Moschen; Arthur Kaser
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 3.  The indigenous gastrointestinal microflora.

Authors:  R D Berg
Journal:  Trends Microbiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 17.079

Review 4.  Probiotics in clinical conditions.

Authors:  Philippe R Marteau
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.667

5.  Lactobacillus acidophilus modulates intestinal pain and induces opioid and cannabinoid receptors.

Authors:  Christel Rousseaux; Xavier Thuru; Agathe Gelot; Nicolas Barnich; Christel Neut; Laurent Dubuquoy; Caroline Dubuquoy; Emilie Merour; Karen Geboes; Mathias Chamaillard; Arthur Ouwehand; Greg Leyer; Didier Carcano; Jean-Frédéric Colombel; Denis Ardid; Pierre Desreumaux
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2006-12-10       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Dual-association of gnotobiotic IL-10-/- mice with 2 nonpathogenic commensal bacteria induces aggressive pancolitis.

Authors:  Sandra C Kim; Susan L Tonkonogy; Thomas Karrasch; Christian Jobin; R Balfour Sartor
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.325

7.  Specific probiotic therapy attenuates antibiotic induced visceral hypersensitivity in mice.

Authors:  E F Verdú; P Bercik; M Verma-Gandhu; X-X Huang; P Blennerhassett; W Jackson; Y Mao; L Wang; F Rochat; S M Collins
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2005-08-16       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 8.  Recent advances in molecular approaches to gut microbiota in inflammatory bowel disease.

Authors:  Akira Andoh; Yoshimi Benno; Osamu Kanauchi; Yoshihide Fujiyama
Journal:  Curr Pharm Des       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.116

9.  Effects of a controlled diet and black tea drinking on the fecal microflora composition and the fecal bile acid profile of human volunteers in a double-blinded randomized feeding study.

Authors:  Volker Mai; Hormuzd A Katki; Hermie Harmsen; Daniel Gallaher; Arthur Schatzkin; David J Baer; Beverly Clevidence
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.798

10.  Oligonucleotide probe for detecting Enterobacteriaceae by in situ hybridization.

Authors:  M Ootsubo; T Shimizu; R Tanaka; T Sawabe; K Tajima; M Yoshimizu; Y Ezura; T Ezaki; H Oyaizu
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.772

View more
  9 in total

1.  The enigmatic role of cholinergic reflex in the pathogenesis of Chagas disease.

Authors:  Luiz G F de A B D'Elia Zanella; Agnaldo Bruno Chies; Maria Angélica Spadella; Altino Luiz Silva Therezo; Patrícia de Souza Rossignoli; Fernando Frei; Luciamáre Perinetti Alves Martins
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 2.  Unravelling the effects of the environment and host genotype on the gut microbiome.

Authors:  Aymé Spor; Omry Koren; Ruth Ley
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Antibiotic-induced dysbiosis alters host-bacterial interactions and leads to colonic sensory and motor changes in mice.

Authors:  M Aguilera; M Cerdà-Cuéllar; V Martínez
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2015-01-20

4.  Host genetic and environmental effects on mouse intestinal microbiota.

Authors:  James H Campbell; Carmen M Foster; Tatiana Vishnivetskaya; Alisha G Campbell; Zamin K Yang; Ann Wymore; Anthony V Palumbo; Elissa J Chesler; Mircea Podar
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Environment-related adaptive changes of gut commensal microbiota do not alter colonic toll-like receptors but modulate the local expression of sensory-related systems in rats.

Authors:  M Aguilera; P Vergara; V Martínez
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-05-12       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  The microbiota-derived metabolite indole decreases mucosal inflammation and injury in a murine model of NSAID enteropathy.

Authors:  Canaan M Whitfield-Cargile; Noah D Cohen; Robert S Chapkin; Brad R Weeks; Laurie A Davidson; Jennifer S Goldsby; Carrie L Hunt; Shelby H Steinmeyer; Rani Menon; Jan S Suchodolski; Arul Jayaraman; Robert C Alaniz
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2016-03-23

Review 7.  Microbial and histopathologic considerations in the use of mouse models of inflammatory bowel diseases.

Authors:  Trenton R Schoeb; Daniel C Bullard
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 5.325

8.  Breeding farm, level of feeding and presence of antibiotics in the feed influence rabbit cecal microbiota.

Authors:  María Velasco-Galilea; Miriam Guivernau; Miriam Piles; Marc Viñas; Oriol Rafel; Armand Sánchez; Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas; Olga González-Rodríguez; Juan P Sánchez
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2020-11-02

9.  Effects of hypersensitivity disorders and environmental factors on the equine intestinal microbiota.

Authors:  S Kaiser-Thom; M Hilty; V Gerber
Journal:  Vet Q       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.320

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.