Literature DB >> 33499975

Breeding farm, level of feeding and presence of antibiotics in the feed influence rabbit cecal microbiota.

María Velasco-Galilea1, Miriam Guivernau2, Miriam Piles3, Marc Viñas2, Oriol Rafel3, Armand Sánchez4,5, Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas3, Olga González-Rodríguez3, Juan P Sánchez3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of the production environment and different management practices in rabbit cecal microbiota remains poorly understood. While previous studies have proved the impact of the age or the feed composition, research in the breeding farm and other animal management aspects, such as the presence of antibiotics in the feed or the level of feeding, is still needed. Characterization of microbial diversity and composition of growing rabbits raised under different conditions could help better understand the role these practices play in cecal microbial communities and how it may result in different animal performance.
RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-five meat rabbits raised in two different facilities, fed under two feeding regimes (ad libitum or restricted) with feed supplemented or free of antibiotics, were selected for this study. A 16S rRNA gene-based assessment through the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform was performed on cecal samples collected from these individuals at slaughter. Different univariate and multivariate approaches were conducted to unravel the influence of the different factors on microbial alpha diversity and composition at phylum, genus and OTU taxonomic levels. The animals raised in the facility harboring the most stable environmental conditions had greater, and less variable, microbial richness and diversity. Bootstrap univariate analyses of variance and sparse partial least squares-discriminant analyses endorsed that farm conditions exerted an important influence on rabbit microbiota since the relative abundances of many taxa were found differentially represented between both facilities at all taxonomic levels characterized. Furthermore, only five OTUs were needed to achieve a perfect classification of samples according to the facility where animals were raised. The level of feeding and the presence of antibiotics did not modify the global alpha diversity but had an impact on some bacteria relative abundances, albeit in a small number of taxa compared with farm, which is consistent with the lower sample classification power according to these factors achieved using microbial information.
CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that factors associated with the farm effect and other management factors, such as the presence of antibiotics in the diet or the feeding level, modify cecal microbial communities. It highlights the importance of offering a controlled breeding environment that reduces differences in microbial cecal composition that could be responsible for different animal performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S MiSeq Illumina sequencing; Analysis of variance; Antibiotics; Breeding farm; Cecal microbiota; Feed restriction; Meat rabbit; Multivariate approach

Year:  2020        PMID: 33499975      PMCID: PMC7807820          DOI: 10.1186/s42523-020-00059-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Microbiome        ISSN: 2524-4671


  49 in total

1.  Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Gut barrier impairment by high-fat diet in mice depends on housing conditions.

Authors:  Veronika Maria Müller; Tamara Zietek; Florian Rohm; Jarlei Fiamoncini; Ilias Lagkouvardos; Dirk Haller; Thomas Clavel; Hannelore Daniel
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 5.914

3.  Feed restriction strategy in the growing rabbit. 2. Impact on digestive health, growth and carcass characteristics.

Authors:  T Gidenne; S Combes; A Feugier; N Jehl; P Arveux; P Boisot; C Briens; E Corrent; H Fortune; S Montessuy; S Verdelhan
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A humanized gnotobiotic mouse model of host-archaeal-bacterial mutualism.

Authors:  Buck S Samuel; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-06-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Diet and feeding pattern affect the diurnal dynamics of the gut microbiome.

Authors:  Amir Zarrinpar; Amandine Chaix; Shibu Yooseph; Satchidananda Panda
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 27.287

6.  The effect of medicated diets and level of feeding on caecal microbiota of lactating rabbit does.

Authors:  L Abecia; M Fondevila; J Balcells; G E Lobley; N R McEwan
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.772

7.  Changes in cecal microbiota and mucosal gene expression revealed new aspects of epizootic rabbit enteropathy.

Authors:  Christine Bäuerl; M Carmen Collado; Manuel Zúñiga; Enrique Blas; Gaspar Pérez Martínez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Body-size Scaling is Related to Gut Microbial Diversity, Metabolism and Dietary Niche of Arboreal Folivorous Flying Squirrels.

Authors:  Po-Yu Liu; An-Chi Cheng; Shiao-Wei Huang; Hsiao-Pei Lu; Tatsuo Oshida; Wenhua Liu; Hon-Tsen Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The role of gut microbiota in shaping the relapse-remitting and chronic-progressive forms of multiple sclerosis in mouse models.

Authors:  K Alexa Orr Gandy; Jiajia Zhang; Prakash Nagarkatti; Mitzi Nagarkatti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Illumina MiSeq Phylogenetic Amplicon Sequencing Shows a Large Reduction of an Uncharacterised Succinivibrionaceae and an Increase of the Methanobrevibacter gottschalkii Clade in Feed Restricted Cattle.

Authors:  Matthew Sean McCabe; Paul Cormican; Kate Keogh; Aaron O'Connor; Eoin O'Hara; Rafael Alejandro Palladino; David Anthony Kenny; Sinéad Mary Waters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  The value of gut microbiota to predict feed efficiency and growth of rabbits under different feeding regimes.

Authors:  María Velasco-Galilea; Miriam Piles; Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas; Juan P Sánchez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Could Dietary Supplementation with Different Sources of N-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Modify the Rabbit Gut Microbiota?

Authors:  Giulio Curone; Filippo Biscarini; Elisa Cotozzolo; Laura Menchetti; Alessandro Dal Bosco; Federica Riva; Paola Cremonesi; Stella Agradi; Simona Mattioli; Bianca Castiglioni; Alessia Di Giancamillo; Alice Cartoni Mancinelli; Susanna Draghi; Alda Quattrone; Giulia Collodel; Silvia Clotilde Modina; Cesare Castellini; Gabriele Brecchia
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-10

3.  Environmental enrichment changes rabbits' behavior, serum hormone level and further affects cecal microbiota.

Authors:  Yang Feng; Huimei Fan; Xue Liang; Xiaofeng Wang; Guoyan Gao; Shuangbao Gun
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Gut Microbiota Modulate Rabbit Meat Quality in Response to Dietary Fiber.

Authors:  Boshuai Liu; Yalei Cui; Qasim Ali; Xiaoyan Zhu; Defeng Li; Sen Ma; Zhichang Wang; Chengzhang Wang; Yinghua Shi
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-03-22

5.  Effect of 6-Methoxybenzoxazolinone on the Cecal Microbiota of Adult Male Brandt's Vole.

Authors:  Xin Dai; Lin Chen; Mengyue Liu; Ying Liu; Siqi Jiang; Tingting Xu; Aiqin Wang; Shengmei Yang; Wanhong Wei
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Use of Bayes factors to evaluate the effects of host genetics, litter and cage on the rabbit cecal microbiota.

Authors:  María Velasco-Galilea; Miriam Piles; Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas; Luis Varona; Juan Pablo Sánchez
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.100

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.