Literature DB >> 2071700

A collagen-based nerve guide conduit for peripheral nerve repair: an electrophysiological study of nerve regeneration in rodents and nonhuman primates.

S J Archibald1, C Krarup, J Shefner, S T Li, R D Madison.   

Abstract

When a peripheral nerve is severed and left untreated, the most likely result is the formation of an endbulb neuroma; this tangled mass of disorganized nerve fibers blocks functional recovery following nerve injury. Although there are several different approaches for promoting nerve repair, which have been greatly refined over recent years, the clinical results of peripheral nerve repair remain very disappointing. In this paper we compare the results of a collagen nerve guide conduit to the more standard clinical procedure of nerve autografting to promote repair of transected peripheral nerves in rats and nonhuman primates. In rats, we tested recovery from sciatic nerve transection and repair by 1) direct microsurgical suture, 2) 4 mm autograft, or 3) entubulation repair with collagen-based nerve guide conduits. Evoked muscle action potentials (MAP) were recorded from the gastrocnemius muscle at 4 and 12 weeks following sciatic nerve transection. At 4 weeks the repair group of direct suture demonstrated a significantly greater MAP, compared to the other surgical repair groups. However, at 12 weeks all four surgical repair groups displayed similar levels of recovery of the motor response. In six adult male Macaca fascicularis monkeys the median nerve was transected 2 cm above the wrist and repaired by either a 4 mm nerve autograft or a collagen-based nerve guide conduit leaving a 4 mm gap between nerve ends. Serial studies of motor and sensory fibers were performed by recording the evoked MAP from the abductor pollicis brevis muscle (APB) and the sensory action potential (SAP) evoked by stimulation of digital nerves (digit II), respectively, up to 760 days following surgery. Evoked muscle responses returned to normal baseline levels in all cases. Statistical analysis of the motor responses, as judged by the slope of the recovery curves, indicated a significantly more rapid rate of recovery for the nerve guide repair group. The final level of recovery of the MAP amplitudes was not significantly different between the groups. In contrast, the SAP amplitude only recovered to the low normal range and there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of sensory recovery rates. The rodent and primate studies suggest that in terms of recovery of physiological responses from target muscle and sensory nerves, entubulation repair of peripheral nerves with a collagen-based nerve guide conduit over a short nerve gap (4 mm) is as effective as a standard nerve autograft.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2071700     DOI: 10.1002/cne.903060410

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Neurol        ISSN: 0021-9967            Impact factor:   3.215


  38 in total

1.  Stimulation of neurite outgrowth using an electrically conducting polymer.

Authors:  C E Schmidt; V R Shastri; J P Vacanti; R Langer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Bioengineered nerve regeneration and muscle reinnervation.

Authors:  Paul J Kingham; Giorgio Terenghi
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Manual stimulation of forearm muscles does not improve recovery of motor function after injury to a mixed peripheral nerve.

Authors:  N Sinis; O Guntinas-Lichius; A Irintchev; E Skouras; S Kuerten; S P Pavlov; H E Schaller; S A Dunlop; D N Angelov
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Approaches to neural tissue engineering using scaffolds for drug delivery.

Authors:  Stephanie M Willerth; Shelly E Sakiyama-Elbert
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 15.470

5.  Composition-property relationships for an experimental composite nerve guidance conduit: evaluating cytotoxicity and initial tensile strength.

Authors:  S Kehoe; X F Zhang; D Boyd
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Precision microchannel scaffolds for central and peripheral nervous system repair.

Authors:  Daniel Lynam; Bridget Bednark; Chelsea Peterson; David Welker; Mingyong Gao; Jeffrey S Sakamoto
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2011-07-16       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 7.  Clinical outcomes for Conduits and Scaffolds in peripheral nerve repair.

Authors:  David J Gerth; Jun Tashiro; Seth R Thaller
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 8.  Biomimetic neural scaffolds: a crucial step towards optimal peripheral nerve regeneration.

Authors:  Jian Du; Huanwen Chen; Liming Qing; Xiuli Yang; Xiaofeng Jia
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 6.843

9.  Distal Inside-Out Epineural Sliding Technique to Repair Segmental Nerve Defects.

Authors:  Toni Luokkala; Jorma Ryhänen; Juha Näpänkangas; Teemu V Karjalainen
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-02-05

10.  Surgical options for recalcitrant carpal tunnel syndrome with perineural fibrosis.

Authors:  Joshua M Abzug; Sidney M Jacoby; A Lee Osterman
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2012-01-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.