Literature DB >> 20716620

Adherence to a breast cancer screening program and its predictors in underserved women in southern Brazil.

Maira Caleffi1, Rodrigo A Ribeiro, Ademar J Bedin, Júlia M P Viegas-Butzke, Fernanda D G Baldisserotto, Giovana P Skonieski, Juliana Giacomazzi, Suzi A Camey, Patrícia Ashton-Prolla.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adherence to breast cancer screening is a key element to ensure effectiveness of programs aiming at downstaging of breast cancer. In this study, we evaluated adherence to a screening program and its predictors in underserved women in southern Brazil.
METHODS: Attendance to the program, which is based on yearly mammogram and clinical examination, was evaluated prospectively. Mean time frames between visits were calculated. Possible predictors of adherence (defined as mean intervals ≤18 mo), such as socioeconomic indicators and health/lifestyle behaviors, were investigated.
RESULTS: A total of 3,749 women (age 51 ± 8 y, illiteracy rate of 6.8%, 57.4% with parity ≥3) were analyzed. Median time between screening rounds was 16.5 months (interquartile range, 13.1-25.7), and median number of rounds attended was 3 (interquartile range, 2-4); 57.6% had mean intervals ≤18, and 71% ≤24 months. The most important independent predictors of adherence were high genetic risk [relative risk (RR), 1.25; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.11-1.40], illiteracy (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.67-0.90), parity ≥5 (RR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.83-0.96), and smoking (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77-0.88).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the proposed screening interval was 1 year, compliance to biannual screening (accepted in several international programs) was high, especially when considering the low socioeconomic level of the sample. IMPACT: This project aims to test a breast cancer screening model for underserved populations in limited-resource countries where adherence is an issue. The identification of worst adherence predictors can point to interventions to improve outcomes of similar public health screening strategies. ©2010 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20716620     DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  12 in total

1.  Cigarette smoking, obesity, physical activity, and alcohol use as predictors of chemoprevention adherence in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Breast Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  Stephanie R Land; Walter M Cronin; D Lawrence Wickerham; Joseph P Costantino; Nicholas J Christian; William M P Klein; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-08-23

Review 2.  Preventing breast cancer in LMICs via screening and/or early detection: The real and the surreal.

Authors:  Subhojit Dey
Journal:  World J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-10

Review 3.  Breast cancer screening: review of benefits and harms, and recommendations for developing and low-income countries.

Authors:  Meteb Al-Foheidi; Mubarak M Al-Mansour; Ezzeldin M Ibrahim
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 3.064

4.  Why the time is right to tackle breast and cervical cancer in low-resource settings.

Authors:  Vivien Davis Tsu; Jose Jeronimo; Benjamin O Anderson
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Psychosocial factors and attendance at a population-based mammography screening program in a cohort of Swedish women.

Authors:  Magdalena Lagerlund; Jessica M Sontrop; Sophia Zackrisson
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  Determinants of Compliance to Breast Cancer Screening and Referral in Low Socio-Economic Regions of Urban India.

Authors:  Sheetal V Kulkarni; Gauravi A Mishra; Rohit R Dusane
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2019-05-17

Review 7.  Challenge of Incorporating New Drugs for Breast Cancer in Brazil: A Proposed Framework for Improving Access to Innovative Therapies.

Authors:  Carlos Barrios; Ruffo Freitas-Junior; Sandro Martins; Jose Bines; Maria Del Pilar Estevez-Diz; Maira Caleffi
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2021-04

8.  Association of adipokines and adhesion molecules with indicators of obesity in women undergoing mammography screening.

Authors:  Caroline Isoppo de Souza; Daniela Dornelles Rosa; Betina Ettrich; Gabriela Hermann Cibeira; Juliana Giacomazzi; Paloma Tusset; Patrícia Ashton-Prolla; Lidia Rosi Medeiros; Maira Caleffi; Eurico Camargo Neto; Emilio Hideyuki Moriguchi; Marcia Silveira Graudenz
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 4.169

9.  Screening for germline BRCA1, BRCA2, TP53 and CHEK2 mutations in families at-risk for hereditary breast cancer identified in a population-based study from Southern Brazil.

Authors:  Edenir Inêz Palmero; Bárbara Alemar; Lavínia Schüler-Faccini; Pierre Hainaut; Carlos Alberto Moreira-Filho; Ingrid Petroni Ewald; Patricia Koehler Dos Santos; Patricia Lisbôa Izetti Ribeiro; Cristina Brinkmann de Netto Oliveira; Florence Le Calvez-Kelm; Sean Tavtigian; Silvia Liliana Cossio; Roberto Giugliani; Maira Caleffi; Patricia Ashton-Prolla
Journal:  Genet Mol Biol       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 1.771

10.  Breast cancer screening attendance in two Swiss regions dominated by opportunistic or organized screening.

Authors:  Monika Eichholzer; Aline Richard; Sabine Rohrmann; Seraina M Schmid; Cornelia Leo; Dorothy J Huang; Uwe Güth
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.