Literature DB >> 20714076

Noninvasive brain stimulation and motor recovery after stroke.

Dennis A Nowak1, Kathrin Bösl, Jitka Podubeckà, James R Carey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Upper limb function is the best predictor of long-term disability after stroke. Despite extensive rehabilitation, recovery of upper limb motor function is frequently incomplete after stroke.
METHODS: We review the pertinent literature on functional reorganization within the cerebral motor network after stroke and noninvasive techniques to modulate brain function towards beneficial plasticity.
RESULTS: Direct current stimulation and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation are powerful tools to (i) modulate cortical excitability, (ii) induce remote changes within the cortical motor system and (iii) thereby improve upper limb motor function after stroke. Today no relevant side effects have been reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Neuromodulation, by means of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques, has been shown to be a safe, feasible and effective method to promote recovery of motor function after stroke. However, several methodological and theoretical issues remain to be addressed in future work.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20714076     DOI: 10.3233/RNN-2010-0552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  16 in total

1.  Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke.

Authors:  Lynley V Bradnam; Cathy M Stinear; P Alan Barber; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Neurophysiological and behavioural effects of dual-hemisphere transcranial direct current stimulation on the proximal upper limb.

Authors:  Alana B McCambridge; James W Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Noninvasive brain stimulation in neurorehabilitation.

Authors:  Marco Sandrini; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2013

4.  Modulation of training by single-session transcranial direct current stimulation to the intact motor cortex enhances motor skill acquisition of the paretic hand.

Authors:  Máximo Zimerman; Kirstin F Heise; Julia Hoppe; Leonardo G Cohen; Christian Gerloff; Friedhelm C Hummel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  Mapping Structure-Function Relationships in the Brain.

Authors:  Abraham Z Snyder; Adam Q Bauer
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging       Date:  2018-10-29

6.  A novel combinational approach of microstimulation and bioluminescence imaging to study the mechanisms of action of cerebral electrical stimulation in mice.

Authors:  Dany Arsenault; Janelle Drouin-Ouellet; Martine Saint-Pierre; Petros Petrou; Marilyn Dubois; Jasna Kriz; Roger A Barker; Antonio Cicchetti; Francesca Cicchetti
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  New modalities of brain stimulation for stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  M A Edwardson; T H Lucas; J R Carey; E E Fetz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  Analgesic effects of noninvasive brain stimulation in rodent animal models: a systematic review of translational findings.

Authors:  Magdalena Sarah Volz; Theresa Sophie Volz; Andre Russowsky Brunoni; João Paulo Vaz Tostes Ribeiro de Oliveira; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2012-07-03

9.  Patterned Brain Stimulation, What a Framework with Rhythmic and Noisy Components Might Tell Us about Recovery Maximization.

Authors:  Sein Schmidt; Michael Scholz; Klaus Obermayer; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Transcranial stimulation of the developing brain: a plea for extreme caution.

Authors:  Nick J Davis
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.