Literature DB >> 20714048

Interphantom and interscanner variations for Hounsfield units--establishment of reference values for HU in a commercial QA phantom.

Erlend Peter Skaug Sande1, Anne Catrine Traegde Martinsen, Eli Olaug Hole, Hilde M Olerud.   

Abstract

In computer tomography (CT) diagnostics, the measured Hounsfield units (HU) are used to characterize tissue and are in that respect compared to nominal HU values found in the radiological literature. Quality assurance (QA) phantoms are commercially available with a variety of tissue substitutes and materials to test the HU values in CT. It is however recognized from CT physics that the HU for a given material is energy dependent and may vary substantially between scanners. The aim of this study is to analyze the characteristics of a commonly used QA phantom, the Catphan 500/600 (The Phantom Laboratory, NY). Four CT phantoms were scanned on one CT scanner to examine possible interphantom variations in HU values. Secondly, one selected phantom was scanned at three kVp levels on eight different CT scanners. The interphantom variations in HU values were small, in the range 2-5 HU. The interscanner variations were however substantial, in the range 7-56 HU depending on energy and material. Varying the x-ray energy produced a shift in the measured HU of up to 79 HU on one scanner. Reference HU values for the eight sensitometric test materials in Catphan are provided for eight CT scanner models from four vendors. The reference HU values are provided for 80, 120 and 140 kVp. Our results suggest that scanner-independent threshold levels for HU should be used only with extreme caution. Tissue characterization can be used provided that a scanner-specific data set for normal and abnormal is determined.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20714048     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/17/015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  20 in total

1.  CT imaging for prediction of complications and recurrence in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis.

Authors:  A Thorisson; K Smedh; M R Torkzad; L Påhlman; A Chabok
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  A review of serial coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) to assess plaque progression and therapeutic effect of anti-atherosclerotic drugs.

Authors:  Jana Taron; Saeyun Lee; John Aluru; Udo Hoffmann; Michael T Lu
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Semi-automatic micro-CT segmentation of the midfoot using calibrated thresholds.

Authors:  Melissa R Requist; Yantarat Sripanich; Andrew C Peterson; Tim Rolvien; Alexej Barg; Amy L Lenz
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Vertebral bone attenuation on low-dose chest CT: quantitative volumetric analysis for bone fragility assessment.

Authors:  Y W Kim; J H Kim; S H Yoon; J H Lee; C-H Lee; C S Shin; Y S Park
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Specificity of unenhanced CT for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic steatosis: implications for the investigation of the natural history of incidental steatosis.

Authors:  Perry J Pickhardt; Seong Ho Park; Luke Hahn; Sung-Gyu Lee; Kyongtae T Bae; Eun Sil Yu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-12-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Quantification of hepatic and visceral fat by CT and MR imaging: relevance to the obesity epidemic, metabolic syndrome and NAFLD.

Authors:  Peter M Graffy; Perry J Pickhardt
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Prediction of treatment response following ethanol sclerotherapy of renal cysts by computed tomography.

Authors:  Min Gwan Kim; Taek Min Kim; Sang Youn Kim; Jeong Yeon Cho
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2022-08-01

8.  Quantification of Tumor Burden in a Genetically Engineered Mouse Model of Lung Cancer by Micro-CT and Automated Analysis.

Authors:  Kai H Barck; Hani Bou-Reslan; Ujjawal Rastogi; Timothy Sakhuja; Jason E Long; Rafael Molina; Anthony Lima; Patricia Hamilton; Melissa R Junttila; Leisa Johnson; Richard A D Carano
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.243

9.  CT image quality over time: comparison of image quality for six different CT scanners over a six-year period.

Authors:  Ana Maria A Roa; Hilde K Andersen; Anne Catrine T Martinsen
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-03-08       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Brain Swelling and Loss of Gray and White Matter Differentiation in Human Postmortem Cases by Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Go Shirota; Wataru Gonoi; Masanori Ishida; Hidemi Okuma; Yukako Shintani; Hiroyuki Abe; Yutaka Takazawa; Masako Ikemura; Masashi Fukayama; Kuni Ohtomo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.