Literature DB >> 20713190

Distal gastrectomy via minilaparotomy for non-overweight patients with T1N0-1 gastric cancer: initial experience of 30 cases.

Hideyuki Ishida1, Toru Ishiguro, Tatsuya Miyazaki, Norimichi Okada, Kensuke Kumamoto, Keiichiro Ishibashi, Norihiro Haga.   

Abstract

Minilaparotomy is considered to be a useful treatment alternative to laparoscopic-assisted surgery from the viewpoint of minimal invasiveness, although it has several limitations for the resection of malignant tumors. We evaluated the usefulness of distal gastrectomy via minilaparotomy for non-overweight patients with clinically diagnosed T1N0-1 gastric cancer. Clinicopathological and surgical data on 30 patients attempted to undergo distal gastrectomy via minilaparotomy (skin incision, ≤7cm) without laparoscopic assistance were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were clinically (preoperatively) diagnosed T1N0-1 gastric cancer that was not suitable for endoscopic mucosal resection located in the middle- or lower-third of the stomach and the patient body mass index ≤ 25.0 kg/m(2). The minilaparotomy approach was successful in 27 patients (90%), while laparoscopic assistance was required to accomplish the procedures in three patients (10%). The type of lymph node dissection was D1 + α in 23 patients and D1 + β in 7 patients. The duration of surgery was 105-170 min (median, 143.5 min) and blood loss was 25-520 mL (median, 152.5 mL). Pathological stage was stage IA in 26 patients, IB in two patients, and stage II in two patients. Postoperative complications were wound infection in one patient, bleeding in one patient, and anastomotic ulcer in one patient. The length of postoperative stay was 7-41 (median, 11) days. With a median follow-up of 31 months, there was no recurrence. Distal gastrectomy via minilaparotomy seems feasible and safe in the majority of non-overweight patients with clinically diagnosed T1N0 gastric cancer.
Copyright © 2010 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20713190     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.302

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  3 in total

1.  Comparison of the risk of surgical site infection and feasibility of surgery between sennoside versus polyethylene glycol as a mechanical bowel preparation of elective colon cancer surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Yusuke Tajima; Hideyuki Ishida; Azusa Yamamoto; Noriyasu Chika; Hisashi Onozawa; Takeaki Matsuzawa; Kensuke Kumamoto; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Erito Mochiki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Comparison of three different minimally invasive procedures of distal gastrectomy for Nonoverweight patients with T1N0-1 gastric cancer.

Authors:  Norihiro Haga; Toru Ishiguro; Kouki Kuwabara; Kensuke Kumamoto; Youichi Kumagai; Hiroyuki Baba; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Hideyuki Ishida
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

3.  A prospective randomized study to assess the optimal duration of intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis in elective gastric cancer surgery.

Authors:  Norihiro Haga; Hideyuki Ishida; Toru Ishiguro; Kensuke Kumamoto; Keiichiro Ishibashi; Yoshitaka Tsuji; Tatsuya Miyazaki
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Apr-Jun
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.