Literature DB >> 20712393

Relationship between quality improvement processes and clinical performance.

Cheryl L Damberg1, Stephen M Shortell, Kristiana Raube, Robin R Gillies, Diane Rittenhouse, Rodney K McCurdy, Lawrence P Casalino, John Adams.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the association between performance on clinical process measures and intermediate outcomes and the use of chronic care management processes (CMPs), electronic medical record (EMR) capabilities, and participation in external quality improvement (QI) initiatives. STUDY
DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of linked 2006 clinical performance scores from the Integrated Healthcare Association's pay-for-performance program and survey data from the 2nd National Study of Physician Organizations among 108 California physician organizations (POs).
METHODS: Controlling for differences in PO size, organization type (medical group or independent practice association), and Medicaid revenue, we used ordinary least squares regression analysis to examine the association between the use of CMPs, EMR capabilities, and external QI initiatives and performance on the following 3 clinical composite measures: diabetes management, processes of care, and intermediate outcomes (diabetes and cardiovascular).
RESULTS: Greater use of CMPs was significantly associated with clinical performance: among POs using more than 5 CMPs, we observed a 3.2-point higher diabetes management score on a performance scale with scores ranging from 0 to 100 (P <.001), while for each 1.0-point increase on the CMP index, we observed a 1.0-point gain in intermediate outcomes (P <.001). Participation in external QI initiatives was positively associated with improved delivery of clinical processes of care: a 1.0-point increase on the QI index translated into a 1.4-point gain in processes-of-care performance (P = .02). No relationship was observed between EMR capabilities and performance.
CONCLUSION: Greater investments in CMPs and QI interventions may help POs raise clinical performance and achieve success under performance-based accountability schemes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20712393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  12 in total

1.  Measuring Success in Health Care Value-Based Purchasing Programs: Findings from an Environmental Scan, Literature Review, and Expert Panel Discussions.

Authors:  Cheryl L Damberg; Melony E Sorbero; Susan L Lovejoy; Grant R Martsolf; Laura Raaen; Daniel Mandel
Journal:  Rand Health Q       Date:  2014-12-30

2.  Identifying patients with hypertension: a case for auditing electronic health record data.

Authors:  Adam Baus; Michael Hendryx; Cecil Pollard
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2012-04-01

3.  The Exnovation of Chronic Care Management Processes by Physician Organizations.

Authors:  Hector P Rodriguez; Rachel Mosher Henke; Salma Bibi; Patricia P Ramsay; Stephen M Shortell
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  Public reporting helped drive quality improvement in outpatient diabetes care among Wisconsin physician groups.

Authors:  Maureen A Smith; Alexandra Wright; Christopher Queram; Geoffrey C Lamb
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  Automated primary care screening in pediatric waiting rooms.

Authors:  Vibha Anand; Aaron E Carroll; Stephen M Downs
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 7.124

6.  Practice context affects efforts to improve diabetes care for primary care patients: a pragmatic cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  L Miriam Dickinson; W Perry Dickinson; Paul A Nutting; Lawrence Fisher; Marjie Harbrecht; Benjamin F Crabtree; Russell E Glasgow; David R West
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Pay-for-Performance: Disappointing Results or Masked Heterogeneity?

Authors:  Adam A Markovitz; Andrew M Ryan
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 3.929

8.  Medicare Accountable Care Organizations of Diverse Structures Achieve Comparable Quality and Cost Performance.

Authors:  Leeann N Comfort; Stephen M Shortell; Hector P Rodriguez; Carrie H Colla
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Pay-for-performance in disease management: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Simone R de Bruin; Caroline A Baan; Jeroen N Struijs
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Impact of care management processes and integration of care on blood pressure control in diabetes.

Authors:  Ken Wong; Luke Boulanger; Amy Smalarz; Ning Wu; Kimberly Fraser; Jenifer Wogen
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.