Literature DB >> 20711675

Molecular signatures for the Crenarchaeota and the Thaumarchaeota.

Radhey S Gupta1, Ali Shami.   

Abstract

Crenarchaeotes found in mesophilic marine environments were recently placed into a new phylum of Archaea called the Thaumarchaeota. However, very few molecular characteristics of this new phylum are currently known which can be used to distinguish them from the Crenarchaeota. In addition, their relationships to deep-branching archaeal lineages are unclear. We report here detailed analyses of protein sequences from Crenarchaeota and Thaumarchaeota that have identified many conserved signature indels (CSIs) and signature proteins (SPs) (i.e., proteins for which all significant blast hits are from these groups) that are specific for these archaeal groups. Of the identified signatures 6 CSIs and 13 SPs are specific for the Crenarchaeota phylum; 6 CSIs and >250 SPs are uniquely found in various Thaumarchaeota (viz. Cenarchaeum symbiosum, Nitrosopumilus maritimus and a number of uncultured marine crenarchaeotes) and 3 CSIs and ~10 SPs are found in both Thaumarchaeota and Crenarchaeota species. Some of the molecular signatures are also present in Korarchaeum cryptofilum, which forms the independent phylum Korarchaeota. Although some of these molecular signatures suggest a distant shared ancestry between Thaumarchaeota and Crenarchaeota, our identification of large numbers of Thaumarchaeota-specific proteins and their deep branching between the Crenarchaeota and Euryarchaeota phyla in phylogenetic trees shows that they are distinct from both Crenarchaeota and Euryarchaeota in both genetic and phylogenetic terms. These observations support the placement of marine mesophilic archaea into the separate phylum Thaumarchaeota. Additionally, many CSIs and SPs have been found that are specific for different orders within Crenarchaeota (viz. Sulfolobales-3 CSIs and 169 SPs, Thermoproteales-5 CSIs and 25 SPs, Desulfurococcales-4 SPs, and Sulfolobales and Desulfurococcales-2 CSIs and 18 SPs). The signatures described here provide novel means for distinguishing the Crenarchaeota and the Thaumarchaeota and for the classification of related and novel species in different environments. Functional studies on these signature proteins could lead to discovery of novel biochemical properties that are unique to these groups of archaea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20711675     DOI: 10.1007/s10482-010-9488-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek        ISSN: 0003-6072            Impact factor:   2.271


  10 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of 16S rRNA and amoA genes from archaea selected with organic and inorganic amendments in enrichment culture.

Authors:  Mouzhong Xu; Jon Schnorr; Brandon Keibler; Holly M Simon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Co-occurence of Crenarchaeota, Thermoplasmata and methanogens in anaerobic sludge digesters.

Authors:  Rakia Chouari; Sonda Guermazi; Abdelghani Sghir
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Contribution of crenarchaeal autotrophic ammonia oxidizers to the dark primary production in Tyrrhenian deep waters (Central Mediterranean Sea).

Authors:  Michail M Yakimov; Violetta La Cono; Francesco Smedile; Thomas H DeLuca; Silvia Juárez; Sergio Ciordia; Marisol Fernández; Juan Pablo Albar; Manuel Ferrer; Peter N Golyshin; Laura Giuliano
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  Origin of diderm (Gram-negative) bacteria: antibiotic selection pressure rather than endosymbiosis likely led to the evolution of bacterial cells with two membranes.

Authors:  Radhey S Gupta
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.271

Review 5.  The Thaumarchaeota: an emerging view of their phylogeny and ecophysiology.

Authors:  Michael Pester; Christa Schleper; Michael Wagner
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 7.934

6.  Phylogeny and Taxonomy of Archaea: A Comparison of the Whole-Genome-Based CVTree Approach with 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis.

Authors:  Guanghong Zuo; Zhao Xu; Bailin Hao
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2015-03-17

7.  Metagenome of a microbial community inhabiting a metal-rich tropical stream sediment.

Authors:  Patrícia S Costa; Mariana P Reis; Marcelo P Ávila; Laura R Leite; Flávio M G de Araújo; Anna C M Salim; Guilherme Oliveira; Francisco Barbosa; Edmar Chartone-Souza; Andréa M A Nascimento
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Protein based molecular markers provide reliable means to understand prokaryotic phylogeny and support Darwinian mode of evolution.

Authors:  Vaibhav Bhandari; Hafiz S Naushad; Radhey S Gupta
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 5.293

9.  Tropical aquatic Archaea show environment-specific community composition.

Authors:  Cynthia B Silveira; Alexander M Cardoso; Felipe H Coutinho; Joyce L Lima; Leonardo H Pinto; Rodolpho M Albano; Maysa M Clementino; Orlando B Martins; Ricardo P Vieira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Close encounters of the third domain: the emerging genomic view of archaeal diversity and evolution.

Authors:  Anja Spang; Joran Martijn; Jimmy H Saw; Anders E Lind; Lionel Guy; Thijs J G Ettema
Journal:  Archaea       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.273

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.