Literature DB >> 2070983

Palatability of a new solution compared with standard polyethylene glycol solution for gastrointestinal lavage.

F Froehlich1, M Fried, J F Schnegg, J J Gonvers.   

Abstract

The salty unpleasant taste of the standard polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution constitutes a major drawback, which limits patient compliance. Recently, a new low-sodium cleansing solution was described and introduced as a major advance, allegedly providing a distinctly better taste and improving compliance. We compared the taste of both solutions, seeking a possible preference applying a double-blind randomized design. Twenty-eight healthy volunteers tasted one of the two solutions without a direct comparison. Both solutions were found to have a similar palatability and an equal salty taste. A different group of 50 volunteers compared the two solutions. Twenty-one preferred the standard solution, 25 preferred the new solution (not significant), and 4 subjects had no preference. Among the subjects basing their preference on the saltiness of the solutions, 18 estimated the standard solution to taste more salty than the new low sodium solution, while 18 volunteers found the new solution to taste more salty than the standard solution. This study does not confirm a taste preference for the new low-salt polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution as compared with the standard solution for colonic cleansing. The difference in the salt concentrations of the two solutions could not regularly be distinguished by a group of healthy volunteers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2070983     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(91)70724-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  5 in total

1.  A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Steven D Wexner; David E Beck; Todd H Baron; Robert D Fanelli; Neil Hyman; Bo Shen; Kevin E Wasco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Mechanism of action and toxicities of purgatives used for colonoscopy preparation.

Authors:  Margaret Adamcewicz; Dilip Bearelly; Gail Porat; Frank K Friedenberg
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.481

Review 3.  Safety issues regarding colonic cleansing for diagnostic and surgical procedures.

Authors:  Larry E Clark; Jack A Dipalma
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  How to choose the best preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  Kaitlin E Occhipinti; Jack A Di Palma
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 46.802

5.  The quest for a more acceptable bowel preparation: comparison of a polyethylene glycol/electrolyte solution and a mannitol/Picolax mixture for colonoscopy.

Authors:  B P Saunders; T Masaki; M Fukumoto; S Halligan; C B Williams
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.401

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.