Literature DB >> 19404268

How to choose the best preparation for colonoscopy.

Kaitlin E Occhipinti1, Jack A Di Palma.   

Abstract

The success and accuracy of colonoscopy is largely dependent on appropriate cleansing of the colon. The ideal bowel preparation should be safe, well-tolerated and effective. Although colonoscopy preparations are vastly better than the earliest barium enemas used in X-ray regimens, none of the currently available formulations sufficiently fulfills the above criteria. Currently used techniques of colon cleansing include dietary and cathartic methods, gut lavage and the administration of phosphates. All of these methods are efficacious, particularly when administered in a split dose (one the evening before and one just before the planned colonoscopy). Gut lavage methods are the safest method; however, dietary and cathartic methods are also reasonably safe. Low-dose phosphate preparations are well tolerated, but safety concerns have led to the withdrawal of some phosphate products from the US market. A new oral sulfate product that achieves a desirable balance of safety, tolerability in patients and efficacy will shortly be introduced. Physicians should be aware of the range of colonoscopy preparations available and their limitations, so that the best preparation can be chosen for an individual patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19404268     DOI: 10.1038/nrgastro.2009.42

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 1759-5045            Impact factor:   46.802


  64 in total

1.  Technology Status Evaluation report. Colonoscopy preparations. May 2001.

Authors:  D B Nelson; A N Barkun; K P Block; J S Burdick; G G Ginsberg; D A Greenwald; P B Kelsey; N L Nakao; A Slivka; P Smith; N Vakil
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Palatability of a new solution compared with standard polyethylene glycol solution for gastrointestinal lavage.

Authors:  F Froehlich; M Fried; J F Schnegg; J J Gonvers
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Randomized, controlled study of pretreatment with magnesium citrate on the quality of colonoscopy preparation with polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution.

Authors:  V K Sharma; E N Steinberg; R Vasudeva; C W Howden
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Golytely lavage versus a standard colonoscopy preparation. Effect on normal colonic mucosal histology.

Authors:  P J Pockros; P Foroozan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 5.  Review article: orthograde gut lavage for colonoscopy.

Authors:  M A Berry; J A DiPalma
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 8.171

6.  The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: a randomized study.

Authors:  Adolfo Parra-Blanco; David Nicolas-Perez; Antonio Gimeno-Garcia; Begona Grosso; Alejandro Jimenez; Juan Ortega; Enrique Quintero
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Impact of bowel preparation on efficiency and cost of colonoscopy.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Thomas F Imperiale; Danielle R Latinovich; L Lisa Bratcher
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 8.  Management of perforation of the colon at colonoscopy.

Authors:  H Kavin; F Sinicrope; A H Esker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Patient acceptance and effectiveness of a balanced lavage solution (Golytely) versus the standard preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  G Thomas; S Brozinsky; J I Isenberg
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 22.682

10.  Bisacodyl reduces the volume of polyethylene glycol solution required for bowel preparation.

Authors:  W J Adams; A P Meagher; D Z Lubowski; D W King
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  7 in total

1.  National CT colonography trial (ACRIN 6664): comparison of three full-laxative bowel preparations in more than 2500 average-risk patients.

Authors:  Amy K Hara; Mark D Kuo; Meridith Blevins; Mei-Hsiu Chen; Judy Yee; Abraham Dachman; Christine O Menias; Betina Siewert; Jugesh I Cheema; Richard G Obregon; Jeff L Fidler; Peter Zimmerman; Karen M Horton; Kevin Coakley; Revathy B Iyer; Robert A Halvorsen; Giovanna Casola; C Daniel Johnson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  The inulin hydrogen breath test predicts the quality of colonic preparation.

Authors:  Donato F Altomare; Leonilde Bonfrate; Marcin Krawczyk; Frank Lammert; Onofrio Caputi-Jambrenghi; Salvatore Rizzi; Michele Vacca; Piero Portincasa
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  A population-based case-crossover study of polyethylene glycol use and acute renal failure risk in the elderly.

Authors:  Nam-Kyong Choi; Yoosoo Chang; Sun-Young Jung; Yu-Kyong Choi; Joongyub Lee; Jin-Ho Lee; Ju-Young Kim; Byung-Joo Park
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Affibody-functionalized gold-silica nanoparticles for Raman molecular imaging of the epidermal growth factor receptor.

Authors:  Jesse V Jokerst; Zheng Miao; Cristina Zavaleta; Zhen Cheng; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Small       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 13.281

5.  Small animal micro-CT colonography.

Authors:  Benjamin Y Durkee; Jamey P Weichert; Richard B Halberg
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 3.608

6.  Toxicology and carcinogenesis study of senna in C3B6.129F1-Trp53 tm1Brd N12 haploinsufficient mice.

Authors:  Inok Surh; Amy Brix; John E French; Bradley J Collins; J Michael Sanders; Molly Vallant; June K Dunnick
Journal:  Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 1.902

7.  Colonoscopy: Preparation and Potential Complications.

Authors:  Wojciech Latos; David Aebisher; Magdalena Latos; Magdalena Krupka-Olek; Klaudia Dynarowicz; Ewa Chodurek; Grzegorz Cieślar; Aleksandra Kawczyk-Krupka
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-18
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.